Stargazing Refracting vs Reflecting Telescopes: Which is Easier to Build?

  • Thread starter Thread starter holliee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Project Telescope
AI Thread Summary
Building a telescope for a physics project can be approached by choosing between refracting and reflecting designs. Reflecting telescopes are generally easier to construct due to their simpler requirements, involving only one surface to grind and polish. Concave mirrors are easier to test and mount compared to multiple lenses needed for refracting telescopes. Resources such as Astronomy magazines often provide guides for building telescopes, which can be beneficial for beginners. Overall, reflecting telescopes are recommended for those looking for a more manageable building experience.
holliee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
(ah, sorry I was not 100% sure were i should post this in the homework help or here, =/)

I am building a telescope for a physics project and was wondering if anyone would be willing to help. I'm not sure were to begin but i do know (or think that I know) that I should build a refracting telescope versus a reflecting telescope, which would be much larger and more difficult.

If anyone thinks they could help or if you know any good websites for making telescopes it would be much appreciated!

Thanks=)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You should look into some Astronomy magazines, most of the major publications have at one point run through a "make your own telescope" guide. I'll try and find some issue numbers of ones I have.
 
Reflecting (mirror) telescopes are easier to build.
You only have one surface to grind/polish.
Concave surfaces are easier to test.
Much easier to mount the mirror than a set of lenses.
You can make the mirror out of pretty much anything stiff enough to be polished, lenses have to be made from specific glasses.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
53K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top