Refraction and Complex refractive index

makotech222
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At a wavelength of 400nm, the semiconductor ZnSe has a complex refractive index n= 3.0+0.32i

A) If 400nm is incidient from air onto ZnSe with θ=tan-1(NR) = 71.6°,
What is the refraction angle of the transmitted wave?

B) Calculate the magnitude R and phase shift ψ associated with the amplitude reflection coefficient r for p-polarized 400nm radiation incident at 71.6°

C) If 400nm radiation with a unit polarization vector 1/√2[1 0] is incident at 71.6 on the air-ZnSe interface, find the unit polarization vector that describes the reflected radiation.

[The matrix is vertical, not horizontal, I'm new with the formatting on this forum :) ]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For part a, i tried using snell's law and just omitted the imaginary part, I'm not sure if it's the right answer because of that though. For the others, I have no idea where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of snell's law is the tangential wavevector must match. It's up to the medium to determine the vertical wavevector given the total wavenumber in the medium, which in your case is complex. Don't be surprised to see a complex wavevector, which corresponds to decaying wave, since it's a lossy medium you're looking at
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top