How Does Refraction Influence Measurement Accuracy in Ripple Tank Experiments?

AI Thread Summary
Refraction can introduce measurement errors in ripple tank experiments by causing the light rays to bend as they pass from air into water, potentially misaligning the observed wave patterns with the actual positions of the waves. This bending can affect the perceived position of the ruler submerged at the bottom of the tank, leading to inaccuracies in wavelength calculations. However, some participants argue that as long as the water depth remains consistent, the impact of refraction on the measurements may be negligible. The discussion also highlights the importance of focusing on diffraction effects, which may have a more significant influence on the experiment's results. Ultimately, while refraction does occur, its effect on measurement accuracy may be minimal under certain conditions.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



I've preformed an experiment where in a ripple tank I had to count the number of waves and length of as long a train of waves as possible, so that I can calculate the wavelength. A stroboscopic light was used and I had to count the number of bright patches/shadows of the ripples cast at the bottom of the tank. There was a ruler submerged in the bottom of the tank to read the length.

The question is, in what ways can refraction (bending of light) cause any errors in the readings?

This is a photo of the situation: http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/3217/experimentlw.jpg

Homework Equations



Snell's Law

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand from Snell's law that when a beam of light enters a more optically dense medium with greater index of refraction (in this case water), it bends toward the normal.

Can I use this to argue that the shadows/bright fringes of the waves have bended slightly and do not really correspond to the exact reading of the ruler at the bottom of the tank?

If not, what else can I cite as a source of error due to refraction? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i am a bit confused but you shouldn't care about refraction here ( as long as the depth is the same ) , you should focus on diffraction instead.
 
ZxcvbnM2000 said:
i am a bit confused but you shouldn't care about refraction here ( as long as the depth is the same ) , you should focus on diffraction instead.

So there is absolutely no way at all that refraction can affect the accuracy of this experiment? Not even to a very small degree?

But the rays clearly bend as they cross the boundary... :confused:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top