Refractive index of Martian atmosphere near surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding reliable references or methods to estimate the refractive index of the Martian atmosphere near the surface, primarily composed of CO2 at low pressure (~6 mbar). Participants express difficulty in locating appropriate equations or values, with some suggesting that existing references focus on air rather than CO2. A specific refractive index value of CO2 is mentioned, but it is noted that this is only a guideline and requires adjustment for Martian conditions. There is also a debate about the effective refractive index potentially being close to 1 due to the atmospheric composition. The conversation highlights the need for accurate data and formulas to better understand Martian atmospheric optics.
Ex1
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,
Does anyone have a good reference for the refractive index of the near surface Martian atmosphere?
(Or alternatively, the means to estimate it from readily available data!)

I'm struggling to think of an equation for which I've got enough of the variables to be of use, (for example assuming the atmosphere is CO2, and the pressure is ~6mbar, temperature etc.)

Hope you'll be able to help. Thanks in advance!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks very much for your reply Janus. But am I missing something obvious? The section taken largely from Birch & Downs's "Correction to the Updated Edlh Equation for the Refractive Index of Air" deals specifically with air rather than CO2, and the tables don't give values for CO2 the pressure regime at the Martian surface. :confused:
 
http://www.ps.missouri.edu/rickspage/refract/refraction.html


CO2 n=1.000449 according to this page, but the page explicitly says the numbers are a guideline only and as far as I can tell there are no references. Since I am assuming this n value is at 1atm, you will have to convert the value to reflect the difference pressure at Mars' surface. I am not sure what forumula will help you do this, I am curious about this too, so if you find the formula post it for me.

Cheers.
 
Mars' atmo is 49 parts vacuum to 1 part air :wink:

I would think its refractive index is effectively 1.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Mars' atmo is 49 parts vacuum to 1 part air :wink:

I would think its refractive index is effectively 1.


Dave, is that at the surface of Mars?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top