Regarding modeling of light bulb circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling energy conservation in a light bulb circuit, emphasizing the need to account for heat loss through convection and conduction. Participants note that the power radiated from the bulb includes both visible light and heat, with the latter making up a significant portion of energy loss, particularly in incandescent bulbs. The Stefan-Boltzmann Law is referenced for calculating radiated power, while the i²R losses in the circuit also encompass heat lost to the air. Additionally, the shape and design of the filament affect the light output and heat dissipation. Accurate predictions of heat loss are complex and depend on various factors, including bulb design and surrounding conditions.
elegysix
Messages
404
Reaction score
15
Hello, I'm trying to apply conservation of energy to a lightbulb circuit, but I can't think of what term should be included for heat loss / convection / conduction


Here's what I've got
Pin = Pradiated + i2Rwire, connections, etc + Power lost to heating surroundings? (what can I use for that?) c(T-T0)?

Are there any other terms I should include?
thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
The power lost to heating the surroundings is a component of the power radiated from the bulb, i.e., not all of the energy coming out of the bulb is visible light. The amount of power radiated is proportional to the difference in the fourth power of the absolute temperatures (Stefan-Boltzmann Law) of the body and its surroundings:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan–Boltzmann_law
 
I intended for Pradiated = Stefan-Boltzmann law.
But there is power lost to heating the air which is not from radiation, right? what could I use for that term?
 
The power radiated as light from the bulb, lost to heating air, etc. are part of the i2R term, not in addition to it.

In an alternating-current circuit you also have some energy radiated in the form of electromagnetic waves at the AC frequency. That is, the circuit acts like a radio antenna although at much lower frequency. I don't have any equations handy, but I'm sure this effect is very small unless the circuit is specifically designed to work as an antenna.
 
jtbell said:
The power radiated as light from the bulb, lost to heating air, etc. are part of the i2R term, not in addition to it.

In an alternating-current circuit you also have some energy radiated in the form of electromagnetic waves at the AC frequency. That is, the circuit acts like a radio antenna although at much lower frequency. I don't have any equations handy, but I'm sure this effect is very small unless the circuit is specifically designed to work as an antenna.

I think he's referring to the R losses in the supply.

Different filament bulbs of the same nominal power will radiate different powers of optical light. It will depend upon the shape and length of the filament (coil or coiled coil) and it would need actual measurements to characterise a particular bulb. Heat lost to the surroundings will depend upon the size of the glass envelope, the gas it's filled with and the cables conduct heat away.
This is not hard to do in an arm waving sort of a way but pretty difficult if you want to make an accurate prediction.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
just in case if your wondering , well if the bulb is incandescent one then it emitts only 5 to 10% in visible light , the rest or up to 90% and more (depending on the bulb type) goes away as heat or infrared.
This is not a precise calculation but those are some approximate numbers that are true.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top