This webpage title could be: Related Rates of Change for Ohm's Law

AI Thread Summary
Ohm's Law, expressed as V=IR, is analyzed in relation to rates of change for voltage (V), current (I), and resistance (R). The discussion clarifies that dV/dt is 1 volt/sec and dI/dt is -1/3 amp/sec. The correct relationship for dR/dt is derived using the quotient rule, leading to the formula dR/dt = (I(dV/dt) - V(dI/dt))/I^2. After substituting values for V and I, the rate of change of resistance is found to be 1.5 ohms/sec, indicating that R is increasing. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the appropriate differentiation method for accurate results.
kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68
Question:
Ohm's law for electrical circuits states that V=IR, where V is voltage, I is current in amperes, and R is the resistance in ohms. Suppose that V is increasing at the rate of 1 volt/sec while I is decreasing at the rate of 1/3 amp/sec. Let t denote time in seconds.
a)what is the value of dV/dt?
b)what is the value of dI/dt?
c)what equation relates dR/dt to dV/dt and dI/dt?
d)Find the rate at which R is changing when V=12 volts and I=2 amps. Is R increasing or decreasing?

I don't think I had any problems with the first 3 parts...

a) \frac{dV}{dt}=1 v/s
b)\frac{dI}{dt}=-\frac{1}{3}amp/sec
c)\frac{dV}{dt}=(\frac{dI}{dt})(\frac{dR}{dt})

I don't quite understand part d. It gives information to be used in the original equation, not the differentiated one. Maybe it is irrelevant and I just need to do this? :

\frac{dV}{dt}=(\frac{dI}{dt})(\frac{dR}{dt})
1v/s=(-\frac{1}{3})(\frac{dR}{dt})
\frac{dR}{dt}=-3 ohms/s

If someone could help me quickly I would appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you need to use the product rule to differentiate the RHS? I would have thought it should be dV/dt = d(IR)/dt = RdI/dt + IdR/dt.
 
  • Like
Likes mdispas
You're right, slipped my mind, Thanks.
 
Nylex said:
Why don't you need to use the product rule to differentiate the RHS? I would have thought it should be dV/dt = d(IR)/dt = RdI/dt + IdR/dt.

Well,Nylex,you're right...Again.He should be differentiating Ohm's law wrt ti time and substitute all known quantities in the new equation and from there to extract dR/dt.

Let's hope he sees his mistake.

Daniel.
 
Yes, I understand my mistake. I had a very similar problem earlier in the homework and did it correctly, the time pressure just made me think a little too fast. When he pointed out I differentiated it incorrectly, I checked my work and realized you actually don't even use product rule, but rather quotient rule since it asks for dR/dt in relation to the others, you need to solve for R then differentiate:

R=\frac{V}{I}
\frac{dR}{dt}=\frac{I{\frac{dV}{dt}}-V{\frac{dI}{dt}}}{I^2}

substituting in numbers:

\frac{dR}{dt}=\frac{(2)(1)-(12)(-\frac{1}{3})}{4}

\frac{dR}{dt}=\frac{6}{4}=1.5 ohms/s

Thanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top