How fast is the distance between two ships changing?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rate at which the distance between two ships, A and B, is changing as they sail away from a point O at a 120-degree angle. Participants suggest using the law of cosines to establish a relationship between the sides of the triangle formed by the ships and then differentiate that relationship to find dc/dt. There is some confusion regarding the correct application of the cosine law, with clarifications made about the formula and the need to treat the angle as constant during differentiation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of implicit differentiation and evaluating the equation with the given rates of speed for both ships. The overall goal is to derive the correct rate of change of the distance between the two ships.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Hello all

I need help with the following question

Two ships A and B are sailing away from the point O along routes such that angle AOB = 120 degrees. How fast is the distance between them changing if, at a certain instant OA = 8 mi. OB = 6 ,i., ship A is sailing at the rate of 20 mi/hr, and ship B at the rate of 30 mi/hr.

I drew an obtuse triangle with the angle 120 degrees. Then I tried using the law of cosines to find the sides. I want to find dY / dt.

Any help is greatly appreciated

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT:Express the area of the triangle in two distinct ways.Use the gact that the angle AOB is constant.

Daniel.
 
Let the sides of the triangle be a, b and c, with c being the straight-line distance between the two ships. Note, then, that you have a, b, da/dt and db/dt. You want dc/dt. All you need is a relationship between a, b, and c - then take the time-derivative of that relationship and you'll be there, minus a little algebra. As you've indicated, you already know how to get that relationship.
 
dextercioby, could you give more detail? Using area sounds interesting but I don't see how it works.

Yes, courtrigrad, using the cosine law is the way I, at least, would do the problem. As Diane suggested, call the length of OA, a, the length of OB, b, and the length of AB, Y (since you used that label). The cosine law says that Y2= a2+ b2- 2abcos(120)= a2+ b2- √(3)ab. To convert that "static" equation into an equation for dY/dt, differentiate both sides (you will need to use "implicit" differentiation). Evaluate with a= 8, b= 6, da/dt= 20, db/dt= 30. You can use the cosine law to find the correct value of Y to put into the equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
S(t)=OB(t)\cdot OA(t) cdot \sin 120=AB(t)\cdot h_{tr.}(t) (1)
There was a '2',but got simplified.Take time derivative
[\frac{dOB(t)}{dt}OA(t)+OB\frac{dOA(t)}{dt}]\sin 120=\frac{dAB(t)}{dt}h_{tr.}(t)+AB(t)\frac{dh_{tr.}(t)}{dt}(1)

Unfortunately the triagle is not isosceles,so the numbers won't be very pretty.With a little bit of trigonometry and geometry,one finds
{dh_{tr.}(t)}{dt}=\frac{3\sqrt{39}}{13}\frac{dOA(t)}{dt} (2)
AB(t)=2\sqrt{13} (3)
h(t)=\frac{24\sqrt{39}}{13} (4)

Eq.(1) pp.(4) give:
\frac{dOA(t)}{dt}=\frac{1}{h}\{\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}[OA(t)\frac{dOB(t)}{dt}+OB(t)\frac{dOA(t)}{dt}]-AB\frac{dh(t)}{dt}\}=\frac{5\sqrt{13}}{2} mph (5)

Daniel.

PS.Maybe your method is better.Mine seemed more intuitive.TO ME.
 
Last edited:
HallsofIvy said:
dextercioby, could you give more detail? Using area sounds interesting but I don't see how it works.

Yes, courtrigrad, using the cosine law is the way I, at least, would do the problem. As Diane suggested, call the length of OA, a, the length of OB, b, and the length of AB, Y (since you used that label). The cosine law says that Y2= a2+ b2- 2abcos(120)= a2+ b2- √(3)ab. To convert that "static" equation into an equation for dY/dt, differentiate both sides (you will need to use "implicit" differentiation). Evaluate with a= 8, b= 6, da/dt= 20, db/dt= 30. You can use the cosine law to find the correct value of Y to put into the equation.

You mean "... = a2+ b2+ab", don't you? (I think you accidentally slipped in the sine of 120 instead of the cosine).
 
I think Halls is right

c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab cos C
 
courtrigrad said:
I think Halls is right

c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab cos C

Yes, this part is right. The angle stays constant (don't make the mistake of taking the derivative of cos C). Since it's constant, the equation could be simplified to c^2=(a^2 + b^2 +ab) prior to differentiating.
 
Oops! Yes, the cos(120)= -1/2, not √(3)/2. The formula should be
c2= a2+ b2+ ab as BobG said.
 
Back
Top