Relating Distance and Speed for orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter astros10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Speed
AI Thread Summary
To relate the distances and speeds of two comets, Kepler's Third Law can be applied, which states that the square of the orbital period of a planet is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit. If the comets are in similar orbits, their speeds can be compared using their distances from the sun. The relationship between distance and speed can also depend on the specific characteristics of their orbits, such as eccentricity. If one comet's speed is known, the other can be calculated using the ratios derived from their distances. Understanding these orbital dynamics is crucial for accurate calculations of cometary speeds.
astros10
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Given just the distances from the sun of two comets for example, and the speed of one of the objects, how could one relate these two objects in order to find the speed the other object is traveling at?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keplers third law?
 
It depends, are the comets in simular orbits?
 
If the comets are in the same orbit.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top