Do Angles in Triangles Ensure Equality of Heights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lo2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Triangles with the same angles are classified as similar triangles, which means all corresponding lengths, including heights, are proportional. This proportionality applies to the sides as well as other dimensions of the triangles. The discussion highlights the relationship between angles and the equality of corresponding heights in similar triangles. The clarification of "angles" instead of "angels" emphasizes the mathematical focus. Overall, the principle of similarity ensures that the heights of triangles with equal angles maintain a consistent ratio.
lo2
For two triangles with the same angels the following applies.

That the relation between the same sides is equal to the realtion between the other same sides. I hope you do understand it.

Then my question is does that also apply for the height of the two triangles?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey, once you get angels involved anything can happen!:rolleyes:

Oh, wait- you mean "angles". Triangles with the same angles are "similar triangles": it follows then that all length's are proportional. That is true not only for the lengths of the sides but all corresponding lengths, such as the height.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Hey, once you get angels involved anything can happen!:rolleyes:

Oh, wait- you mean "angles". Triangles with the same angles are "similar triangles": it follows then that all length's are proportional. That is true not only for the lengths of the sides but all corresponding lengths, such as the height.

Oops I did of course mean angles. And thank you for your answer.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top