Relation between the velocity vector and the acceleration vector of an object

AI Thread Summary
In uniform circular motion, the position vector is expressed as u=cos(wt)i +sin(wt)j, with the velocity and acceleration vectors being constant in magnitude and perpendicular at each instant. Knowing the velocity vector at a specific time allows for the calculation of angular frequency (ω), which can then be used to predict the position vector at any future time. This relationship holds true because the motion is circular and uniform, providing a consistent framework for analysis. Additionally, the acceleration vector can also be derived similarly, reinforcing the predictability of the motion. Thus, both vectors provide essential information for determining future positions in circular motion.
Clockclocle
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
velocity vector and acceleration vector
Relevant Equations
u=cos(wt)i +sin(wt)j
A uniform circular motion of a point always yield an equation u=cos(wt)i +sin(wt)j of position vector. Which we deduce the acceleration and velocity vector with constant magnitude and they are perpendicular at each instant. Can I use the information of them at one instant to predict the position vector at any instant later? Or they are only provide the information that the point is moving in the direction of velocity vector and also is affected by a centripetal force point toward the center of the circle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clockclocle said:
Homework Statement: velocity vector and acceleration vector
Relevant Equations: u=cos(wt)i +sin(wt)j

A uniform circular motion of a point always yield an equation u=cos(wt)i +sin(wt)j of position vector. Which we deduce the acceleration and velocity vector with constant magnitude and they are perpendicular at each instant. Can I use the information of them at one instant to predict the position vector at any instant later? Or they are only provide the information that the point is moving in the direction of velocity vector and also is affected by a centripetal force point toward the center of the circle?

Somewhat. If you already know the motion is circular around the origin with radius 1 and uniform, you can write $$\vec u = \cos(\omega t)\hat \imath+\sin(\omega t)\hat \jmath)\tag{1}$$
for the position vector, as you did.

Taking the derivative ##\vec v \equiv {d\vec u\over dt}## gives $$\vec u = \omega\left (-\sin(\omega t)\hat \imath+\cos(\omega t)\hat \jmath)\right )\tag {2}$$

Knowing the velocity vector at some instant ##t_0## would give you ##\omega## and ##t_0##, which you can use in ##(1)## for any ##t##.

And you could also do something similar from ##\vec a##, the second derivative.

##\ ##
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top