Relationship of velocity of the impact to crater depth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the relationship between impact velocity and crater depth through experimental methods. The original poster conducted an experiment and derived an equation suggesting a quadratic relationship, specifically y=0.003x^2, where x represents velocity and y represents crater depth. Another participant pointed out that the prefactor in the equation is influenced by the material properties, indicating that different materials will yield different crater depths for the same impact velocity. The original poster acknowledged this insight, realizing the importance of material characteristics in their findings. Understanding these variables is crucial for accurately assessing the impact velocity's effect on crater depth.
yiuscott
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have to do a project on finding out the relationship of velocity of the impact to crater depth by experimental methods, then we are supposed to find out the answer on the internet and compare it without experimental results. However, i couldn't find any website that wrote down any relationship between impact velocity and crater depth


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well, i did it experimentally. Also, i guess the impact is to do with the kinetic energy:
E=0.5mv^2
therefore i think a square relationship with the velocity should be expected.

however for my experiment i found an equation that is something like y=0.003x^2. I think that may be wrong...

Thank You Very Much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your experiment, what are y and x? If x is the velocity, then there is no problem is there? Certainly the prefactor of v^2 will not be just m/2, because also properties of the material will be involved (the impact crater in sand is deeper than in wood, for example).
 
Thank you for the reply.

X is my velocity and y is the depth of the crater.

I didn't realize that the number in front was to do with the material. :redface: Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top