Relativistic Doppler Effect - Arbitrary Velocity

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Find the observed frequency ##\nu## in terms of proper frequency ##\nu_0##, speed ##v## and radial velocity component ##v_r## for a source moving at velocity ##\vec v## with respect to the observer.

Now consider an observer in frame S where the source is seen moving at speed ##\vec v## along x-axis and at ##y=y_0##. At ##t=0##, the source is seen to emit frequency in ##-\hat y## direction. Find energy detected by the observer in terms of ##E_0## and ##|v|##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part(a)
Not sure how to approach this part. We've always done problems in standard configuration..


Part (b)

2010_B2_Q6.png


\nu = \gamma \nu_0
E = \gamma E_0 = \frac{E_0}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

Is this too easy to be true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's right. If you think about it, this differs from the non-relativistic Doppler shift because at t=0, the source isn't moving toward or away from the observer, yet you still see a change in frequency.
 
vela said:
That's right. If you think about it, this differs from the non-relativistic Doppler shift because at t=0, the source isn't moving toward or away from the observer, yet you still see a change in frequency.

Yeah I thought so too, it's just a manifestation of time dilation (which is independent of how far you are away in the non-general relativity context).

Any tips on part (a)?
 
bumpp
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top