Relativistic electron in static electric field

Hybird
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Electron placed in static electric field \vec{E} = -\Psi\hat{x} , its initial velocity is 0. Calculate V(t).


Homework Equations



F_{e}=\frac{d}{dt}p(t)

p(t) = \gamma(t)mv(t)

Gamma is 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) of course


The Attempt at a Solution



This is how I go about it and want to know if I'm on the right track.

i) First you multiply the electric field by the charge of an electron to get:

F_{e} = \frac{d}{dt}p(t) = e\Psi

ii) Then you integrate wrt time to get:

p(t) = e\Psit

iii) Then you relate momentum to velocity by:

p(t) = \gammamv(t)

iv) Finally you solve for V(t) from the above equation, expressing gamma explicitly I get the following formula:

v(t) = \frac{e{\Psi}t}{m}*\frac{1}{ {\sqrt{1+ {\frac{ e^{2}{\Psi}^{2}t^{2} }{ m^{2}c^{2} }} }} }

Does this seem to be the right method? I have to integrate this eventually to get x(t)..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This doesn't seem right because V(t) is unbounded as t goes to infinity and thus we would pass the speed of light correct?
 
Hybird said:
This doesn't seem right because V(t) is unbounded as t goes to infinity and thus we would pass the speed of light correct?
No. This expression

Hybird said:
v(t) = \frac{e{\Psi}t}{m}*\frac{1}{ {\sqrt{1+ {\frac{ e^{2}{\Psi}^{2}t^{2} }{ m^{2}c^{2} }} }} }

approaches c as t goes to infinity.
 
Last edited:
So maybe I am on the right track. Just curious, how do you get that limit? Do you have to binomial expand the square root?
 
Hybird said:
how do you get that limit? Do you have to binomial expand the square root?
I don't know what you mean by that, but probably not. After you do about 100 million of these kinds of limits, you just start to smell the approach. In this case, I just know that the other stuff under the radical will be much larger than 1, so I ignore the 1. The rest is straightforward. I think the more mathy way to do it is to divide top and bottom by t or something ...
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top