Relativistic Mechanics (momentum)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the momentum of an electron with a kinetic energy of 1.00 MeV using relativistic mechanics. The user initially suspects an error due to an unexpectedly large result and attempts to apply the equation E² = m²₀c⁴ + p²c². After several calculations, they find a discrepancy when plugging values back into the equation, leading to confusion over the terms. Ultimately, they correct their approach and acknowledge a mistake in their calculations, clarifying that they had overlooked a crucial component in the equation. The conversation highlights the importance of careful term management in relativistic momentum calculations.
Cmertin
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I did the problem, though I don't think that it is right. I think that the number is to big so I think I might have screwed up somewhere though I don't know where.

Homework Statement


What is the momentum (in units of MeV/c) of an electron with a kinetic energy of 1.00 MeV?

Homework Equations


Energy_{kinetic} = Energy
E^{2} = m^{2}_{0}c^{4} + p^{2}c^{2}
c = 3E8 m/s
m0 = rest mass = .511 MeV c^{-2}

The Attempt at a Solution


E^{2} = m^{2}_{0}c^{4} + p^{2}c^{2}
p^{2}c^{2} = m^{2}_{0}c^{4} - E^{2}
p^{2}c^{2} = (.511 MeV c^{-2})^{2}(3x10^{8}m/s)^{4} - (1.00 MeV)^{2}
p^{2}c^{2} = 2.35E16 MeV^{2}
pc = 1.53E8 MeV
p = 1.53E8 MeV c^{-1}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, p^{2} c^{2} = E^{2} - m_{0}^{2} c^{4} - rearrange your terms carefully.

Next, ( 0.511 MeV c^{-2} )^{2} ( c^{4} ) = 0.511 MeV^{2}
Note that the c^{-2} is also squared!
 
OK, thanks for your help, though the left and the right side of the equations are not matching up when I go to plug the answers back in.

I got that p = .8596 MeV c-1

Plugging it back in, I get
p2c2 = E - m02c4
(.8596 [STRIKE]c-1[/STRIKE])2[STRIKE]c2[/STRIKE] = 1 - (.26112 MeV2 [STRIKE]c-4[/STRIKE])[STRIKE]c4[/STRIKE]
.7389 = .2611
 
Err..it should be 0.7389 = 1 - 0.2611 *points to your 2nd last equation* which is coherent.
 
Fightfish said:
Err..it should be 0.7389 = 1 - 0.2611 *points to your 2nd last equation* which is coherent.

My bad, I'm a retard today... Thanks for your help (I forgot that the 1 was there...)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top