Relativity of simultaneity question

laurub
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
i have a question about chapter 37.2 relativity of simultaneity (pearsons international edition university physics, 12th edition) .

the text besides image b sais: inside the train, mavis moves toward the light coming from the front of the train and away from the light coming from the back of train.

then image c shows the light from the front of the train reaching her first, in my understanding, this implies mavis sees the flashes at different times because she is moving towards the origin of one of the flashes.

this is very confusing to me, because what i learned in the previous chapter tells me that cA' = cB' no matter how the train moves.

Above statement is correct right?!

if it is, then why does it look like the images are trying to tell me cA' < cB' in mavis' frame.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laurub said:
then image c shows the light from the front of the train reaching her first, in my understanding, this implies mavis sees the flashes at different times because she is moving towards the origin of one of the flashes.
The light reaches her at different times (everyone agrees with this) and she concludes that the light flashes must have happened at different times in her frame.

this is very confusing to me, because what i learned in the previous chapter tells me that cA' = cB' no matter how the train moves.
Yes, the speed of light is the same in every frame. This is what forces her to conclude that the flashes were not simultaneous in her frame.

if it is, then why does it look like the images are trying to tell me cA' < cB' in mavis' frame.
Please explain why you think that.
 
thank you, your response led me to seeing my mistake, i focussed so much on the arrows and waves from A' and B' that i did not see the arrows and waves from A and B, and this somehow led to my mistake.

I no longer think the images are confusing.

EDIT
I got confused because A' and B' in image a are on the corners of the train, in image b they aren't, and in image c they are again on the corners of the train.
is this a printing error?
 
Last edited:
laurub said:
thank you, your response led me to seeing my mistake, i focussed so much on the arrows and waves from A' and B' that i did not see the arrows and waves from A and B, and this somehow led to my mistake.

I no longer think the images are confusing.
Good. :approve:

EDIT
I got confused because A' and B' in image a are on the corners of the train, in image b they aren't, and in image c they are again on the corners of the train.
is this a printing error?
Looks like they were a bit sloppy with the diagrams. A' and B' are the ends of the train; they should move with the train.

I see that Mavis has moved to a different seat in diagram b. More sloppiness!
 
Doc Al said:
I see that Mavis has moved to a different seat in diagram b. More sloppiness!

yes, A' and B' are incorrectly moved the same amount of distance as mavis is.
they are probably caused by the same printing error since they both only occur in diagram b.
 
laurub said:
yes, A' and B' are incorrectly moved the same amount of distance as mavis is.
they are probably caused by the same printing error since they both only occur in diagram b.
I'll bet you are right.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top