Relativity vs. Quantum Theory: Which Reigns Supreme in Black Hole Physics?

AI Thread Summary
Physicists recognize that both relativity and quantum theory are valid within their respective domains, with relativity applicable to massive objects over large distances and quantum mechanics relevant for small-scale phenomena. The two theories often yield conflicting results when applied to black holes, where neither provides a satisfactory explanation. While relativity is essential for understanding the behavior of stars and large-scale structures, quantum mechanics governs atomic and subatomic interactions. The challenge lies in reconciling these theories into a unified framework that can accurately describe extreme conditions. Ongoing research aims to develop a theory that integrates both perspectives effectively.
sr6622
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
what do most physicists today believe in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this really a homework question? :confused:

Physicists accept both relativity and quantum theory.
 
Not really...i just sort of wanted to know since they contradict each other
 
Physicists believe that when you look at massive objects over large distances, GR provides the right answer, while the QM is usually uncomputable.

Physicists believe that at small distances with small objects, QM gives the right answer while GR usually doesn't apply / gives nonsense.

They are both right, when you are looking at a specific circumstance, they only contradict when we are talking about Black Wholes and other objects that are small and massive or large (distance) with small (mass). Then physicists don't believe either because they both give nonsense.

~Lyuokdea
 
No, they do not "contradict each other". They apply to different situations and there is some difficulty when you try to fit them together. Both have given excellent experimental results (GPS requires relativity to give accurate results and transistors are based on quantum theory). Presumably some theory that includes both quantum theory and relativity as special cases will be found- that's pretty much the way science works.
 
As others said they are used differently, Relativity is used when it comes to extremely massive objects such as stars. Quantum mechanics is used when describing small objects such as atoms and what happens within it. Now when you have to use both which is why there are some disagreements are which one to use when describing a Black hole.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top