Relativity: Rocket shoots a bullet straight down

AI Thread Summary
A rocket traveling at 0.8c launches a projectile at 0.6c perpendicular to its motion, raising questions about the projectile's speed in the Earth's reference frame. The initial approach using one-dimensional relativistic velocity addition is flawed due to the multi-directional nature of the velocities involved. The correct method requires applying the vector form of velocity addition, considering that time is experienced differently on the rocket compared to Earth. This discrepancy affects the perceived speed of the projectile, which cannot simply be calculated as the square root of the sum of the squares of the velocities. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding relativistic effects in multi-dimensional motion.
mitchmaniac20
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rocket passes the Earth at 0.8c. As it goes by, it launches a projectile at 0.6c perpendicular to the direction of motion. What is the projectile's speed in the Earth's reference frame?

Homework Equations



[;u=\frac{u'+v}{1+u'v/{c}^{2}};]

The Attempt at a Solution



Since in the direction of the rocket's motion, u'=0, u=v=.8c. In the perpendicular direction since v=0, u'=u=.6c. However, this makes the overall speed of the projectile [;\sqrt{{.8c}^{2}+{.6c}^{2}}=c;], which shouldn't be possible...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is incorrect to use the one-dimensional relativistic velocity addition formula if there are motions in multiple directions. In that case you need to take account of the more general vector form for velocity addition. This is essentially because even though all of the rocket's motion is perpendicular to the projectile's motion, time is still measured differently on the rocket than on Earth, so what the rocket sees as 0.6 c in the perpendicular direction, we will necessarily see as something different.
 
Thanks, this was actually part b where part a was to derive the velocity transformations in the direction perpendicular to motion, which I had incorrectly found to be u'=u, but your comment made me rethink that. Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top