Release or absortion of energy on bonds and phase change

AI Thread Summary
Energy is required to break intermolecular bonds, as moving a molecule from a lower potential energy state to a higher one necessitates work, similar to lifting an object. The confusion arises when considering the reverse process: when molecules lose kinetic energy, they come closer together, leading to bond formation. This process can release energy, which is often misunderstood. The release of energy during bond formation occurs because the system transitions to a lower energy state, and this energy is released as heat to the surroundings. Cooling is necessary for solidification because molecules must be close together and possess low energy for bonds to form effectively. In essence, breaking bonds requires energy input, while forming bonds releases energy, highlighting the interconnected nature of these processes. Intermolecular bonds, while weaker than other types of bonds, follow the same fundamental principles regarding energy and forces.
FG_313
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
I believe I can explain why there is energy needed to break intermoleculares bonds and getting into a gas or liquid, but the other way around confuses me. Bonds have potential energy associated to it, so It's needed work to break the bonds, because we would be trying to move a molecule away from a lower potential energy to a higher, like lifting an object. (Is that correct?) Now the other way confuses me, if the molecules get less kinetic energy when heat is transferred to the outside of the system, and than they get closer together so the bonds "stick" or if the bonds being created is what gives heat to the surroundings. If I'm completaly wrong in those explanations please let me know and explain it to me, or refer me to an adequate material.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
To be honest I have no idea what the problem is. However, if you have no problems understanding the process when it goes one way, simply reverse everything - and you have the reverse process.

FG_313 said:
if the molecules get less kinetic energy when heat is transferred to the outside of the system, and than they get closer together so the bonds "stick" or if the bonds being created is what gives heat to the surroundings.

Both. Removing kinetic energy is cooling the gas/liquid, energy of bonds is a latent heat.
 
Thank you, but the reason for the question is that I don`t understand why there is a release of energy when intermolecular bonds are made (why we need to cool a liquid for it to solidificate). There is a need for cooling because the molecules have to be closer together and with low energy so that the bonds can be made or there is a need for energy release in the forming of the bonds. If the second or, like you said, both are true, what in the formation of bonds is responsable for the energy release and please describe how that happens. There is work/energy needed to separate two molecules and make them free (gas/liquid), and I attempted to understand it in therms of eletromagnetic forces, but why the forming releases energy is what I don`t understand, in therms of forces, energy and potencial.
 
In general breaking any bond requires energy, and the opposite - energy being produced when the bond is created - is also true. Technically these are identical processes, just running in different directions.

Intermolecular bonds are not much different in this aspect from other bonds, the main difference is their (typically much lower) strength.
 
Thread 'How to make Sodium Chlorate by Electrolysis of salt water?'
I have a power supply for electrolysis of salt water brine, variable 3v to 6v up to 30 amps. Cathode is stainless steel, anode is carbon rods. Carbon rod surface area 42" sq. the Stainless steel cathode should be 21" sq. Salt is pure 100% salt dissolved into distilled water. I have been making saturated salt wrong. Today I learn saturated salt is, dissolve pure salt into 150°f water cool to 100°f pour into the 2 gallon brine tank. I find conflicting information about brine tank...
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top