Medical Researching Inner Monologue: Experiments & Audio Tools

AI Thread Summary
Current discussions on inner monologue research highlight its connection to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as an effective method for altering self-talk. Psychoanalysis is also mentioned as a more intensive option for those with the resources. The inner monologue is often described as a dialogue or even a trialogue, reflecting complex thought processes. Research indicates that the brain processes imagined experiences similarly to actual sensory experiences, activating the same areas of the visual cortex. This suggests that inner monologue and visualization can evoke vivid mental imagery without direct sensory input. Participants seek audio tools or websites that can help positively influence the tone and function of their inner dialogue, indicating a growing interest in practical applications for enhancing self-talk through auditory stimuli.
Matt2012
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is anyone currently researching the inner monologue? Where can I find information about experiments to alter the inner monologue? Are there any websites which have "audio tools" which, when listened to, can positively alter the tone and function of the inner monologue?

Cheers,
 
Biology news on Phys.org
If by monologue, you mean that self-talk stuff, Cognitive Behavioral therapy is the fast track, got money to burn, try psychoanalyis.

Personally its more like a dialogue or on really bad days a trialogue, Joni Mitchell said it best (tho I believe the song was written by someone else).

My analyst told me
That I was right out of my head
But I said dear doctor
I think that its you instead
Because I have got a thing
Thats unique and new
To prove it Ill have
The last laugh on you
cause instead of one head
I got two
And you know two heads are better than one.
 
this is part of the research into dreams and imagination- from what I have gathered it seems the general framework of imagined qualia like inner monologue or imagined images/sounds is that they are essentially the same activity as with direct sensory stimulation- both seeing a car and thinking of/remembering seeing a car fire the same patterns of activity in the visual cortex- the main difference appears to be that the sensory receptors are not active themselves- the brain essentially makes you see again something based on what you saw before [with imagination it's a novelty of different parts of remembered images] but since the actual sensory receptors of your eyes aren't being stimulated by the brain retriggering the visual cortex acivity you don't physically see what you imagine- yet you can visualize it very vividly-
 
Last edited:
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top