Resistance equivalence and circuit current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the equivalent resistance and current in a complex circuit. Participants suggest starting with simpler combinations of resistors, specifically identifying parallel and series arrangements. There is consensus that redrawing the circuit can clarify the relationships between the resistors. The correct approach involves combining resistors R3 and R5 in parallel, then adding R2, and finally incorporating R6. Ultimately, the equivalent resistance is determined to be 15.4 ohms.
Robb
Messages
225
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


a) find the equivalent resistance of the circuit below b) each current in the circuit c) the potential difference across each resistor d the power dissipated by each resistor.

upload_2016-3-13_17-43-6.png


Homework Equations


V=IR
R=(1/R)^-1

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure if I did the resistance equivalency correctly. I combined R2 and R6 in series and then combined R2, R3, and R5 as in parallel. I then treated R1, R2/3/5/6 and R4 as in series. Also, need help going back and finding the current. Please advise.

upload_2016-3-13_17-43-29.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robb said:
I combined R2 and R6 in series and then combined R2, R3, and R5 as in parallel. I then treated R1, R2/3/5/6 and R4 as in series.
That's not making sense to me...

Start at the outside (far right side), and start doing parallel and series combinations. Start with R4 and R5 and try again? :smile:
 
If the current can go to one resistor or another, but not both, then the resistors are not in series. See if you can redraw the circuit in a less-complicated looking manner by redrawing the diagonal portion to look more like a typical rectangular circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I see R3(bottom right) and R5 being in parallel. If I combine those they would be in series with R2 (top right). Is that a good start?
 
Robb said:
I see R3(bottom right) and R5 being in parallel. If I combine those they would be in series with R2 (top right). Is that a good start?

Correct! Notice that R3 and R5 share both of their nodes. That's how you would spot that.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Ok. Maybe I'm making a mountain out of a mole hill! I saw something online that showed R5(R2+R6)/R2+R5+R6. So, R2 and R6 are in series with each other but Parallel with R5. Do you agree? I Think that's what was throwing me for a loop. Wasn't sure which way to go with it.
 
No, R2 and R6 are not in series with each other as the circuit is written. Eventually, however, you'll find new series and parallel combinations as you continue to combine your resistors. Your parallel combination of R3 and R5 are in series with R2. What can you combine next?
 
So, combine R3 and R5 as in parallel. Then The sums R1R2 and R4R1, respectively, which puts them in series with R6. Combine the remaining as in series?
 
I struggle to read your hand writing but R3 and R5 in parallel looks correct. As far as I can see R1 and R2 are not in series so summing them appears incorrect.

As I see it the starting sequence should be

Step 1... (R3//R5)
Step 2... (R3//R5) + R2
Step 3... (R3//R5) + R2) // R6

where // means "in parallel with"
 
  • #10
I agree with axmls, the original diagram makes my head hurt, and it should be redrawn.
I did it by pretending all the resistors were connected with rubber bands, disconnecting the negative end of the terminal, and stretching everything to the right.
Triple check that all the paths are correct.
Then add in a wire, blue, to complete the circuit.

2016.03.14.hw.problem.861942.jpg


This, visually, makes it much easier for me to see what's going on.
 
  • #11
I agree. THANK YOU!
 
  • #12
Robb said:
I agree. THANK YOU!
Please let us know what you get as an answer, as...

rubber.bandy.method.png
 
  • #13
15.4 ohm's
 
  • #14
Robb said:
15.4 ohm's
That's what I get.
:partytime:
 
  • #15
Graicas my friend!
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #16
OmCheeto said:
I agree with axmls, the original diagram makes my head hurt, and it should be redrawn.
I did it by pretending all the resistors were connected with rubber bands, ...
Conductive rubber, I hope !
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
305
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top