Resistance of an electric motor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the resistance of an electric motor connected to a 120 V, 60 Hz supply, which operates at 0.1 hp and consumes 650 mA of current. The calculated resistance is approximately 176.6 Ω, derived from the power formula P = i_rms²R. However, there is a distinction between this calculated resistance and the direct current resistance measured with an ohmmeter when the motor is stopped, as the latter does not account for inductive effects. Additional losses in the motor, such as friction and eddy currents, also contribute to the difference in resistance values. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of motor resistance beyond simple calculations.
pc2-brazil
Messages
198
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


An electric motor connected to a 120 V, 60 Hz supply does work at a rate of 0.1 hp (1 hp = 746 W). If it consumes an rms (root mean square) current of 650 mA, what is its resistance, in terms of power transmission? Would this result be the same thing as the resistance of its coils, measured by an ohmmeter, with the motor disconnected from the generator?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


The average power delivered by the power supply to the motor is P_{av} = i_{rms}^2R. Since P=(0.1)(746)=74.6\ \mathrm{W}, and i_{rms} = 0.65\ \mathrm{A}, then R = \frac{74.6}{0.65^2} = 176.6\ \Omega (this is the correct value at the back of the book).
My doubt regards the second question. I imagine that, since the resistance R that is used in the power formula of an RLC circuit is simply the resistance of the circuit, the value of the resistance should remain the same, even if it was measured by an ohmmeter with the motor stopped (it's just the impedance that would be different). However, the answer to this says that: "This would not be the same as the direct current resistance of the coils of a stopped motor, because there would be no inductive effects.".

Is my reasoning correct?

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pc2-brazil said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The average power delivered by the power supply to the motor is P_{av} = i_{rms}^2R. Since P=(0.1)(746)=74.6\ \mathrm{W}, and i_{rms} = 0.65\ \mathrm{A}, then R = \frac{74.6}{0.65^2} = 176.6\ \Omega (this is the correct value at the back of the book).
Resistance is what you would measure with the ohmmeter across the input terminals of the motor with the motor stopped. If I understand the problem correctly, we can calculate that from the information provided.

Here, the power input is P = VrmsIrms. That is 120 x .65 =78 Watts. The power output is 74.6 W. Efficiency = 74.6/78 = 95.6%

Use that efficiency to determine the percentage of energy that is lost through resistance (ie. the I^2R loss). You can determine R from that.

AM
 
I don't really like the book answer.

You calculated R=176.6 from the power lost but that assumes all the power lost is in the winding resistance. It's not. There are other sources of loss in a motor such as friction in the bearings, air drag on the rotor, eddy current losses in ferrite parts etc. These also account for some of the loss. So the real resistive losses would be lower. So when you just measure R with a meter it will be different.
 
The book answer is okay since the question is asking what the motor looks like to the power transmission network. An equivalent load "black-box"approach.

The book answer to the second part is fine too as long as you realize that "inductive" effects is covering all the interesting behaviour of a real motor. For example a spinning motor behaves like a generator and produces back-emf . So very crudely inside the black box is the resistance from the copper winding in series with a variable voltage power supply whose voltage is given by how fast the motor is spinning. The I-V characteristic of a spinning motor does not look like the resistance in an R L C circuit.

I share CWatters concern that the book answer may mislead you into thinking that this 177 ohm resistance is a physical resistor.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top