Resonable Fluid Speeds for cooling

  • Thread starter Thread starter almarsd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cooling Fluid
AI Thread Summary
A reasonable design limit for air velocity in electric motor cooling systems is debated, with suggestions ranging from 80-100 ft/s for standard applications to a maximum of 250-300 ft/s based on experimental literature. Speeds approaching Mach 1 are considered excessive, as they can lead to issues like shock waves and increased friction heating, which may negate cooling benefits. The discussion emphasizes the importance of matching airflow conditions to heat transfer rates to optimize system performance. Additionally, participants recommend conducting thorough analyses, including hand calculations and finite element analysis (FEA), to ensure structural integrity and effective cooling. Reference materials from organizations like ASHRAE, IEEE, and ASME are suggested for further research on airflow speeds.
almarsd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have a general question on fluid speed for air.

What would be a reasonable design limit velocity for air?

Assuming that it does not pass the speed of sound which can bring an whole set of other problems 1116 ft/s = 761 mph at sea level.

Would 900ft/s be a reasonable limit?

Here is a little background on the problem. I am designing an electric motor cooling system with different size ducting/channels. As we all know through fluid dynamics, the velocity is a function of area/mass flow. I can change the area/mass flow to increase/decrease velocity. The velocity will determine my heat coefficient, which I am trying to optimize for each section of the cooling system. I have velocities from 2 to 900 ft/s in the system. I am trying to find the upper design limit for velocity but there are very little information on the web.

Thank you for reading this.

Alvin
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That seems really really fast for cooling an electric engine. I would imagine at those speeds you wil have to worry about heating due to friction. How are you going to generate speeds like that?
 
Don't forget about the energy required to move air that fast. You'll end up expending more energy than you needed to if instead you moved the same volume through a larger space at a lower velocity.
 
At those speeds you'd probably "waste" a lot of the thermal mass of the air because there is almost no way you will have a heat transfer rate high enough to keep up with that.

Also keep in mind that even in a base flow moving at Mach 0.7 you can have local supersonic region.

In short: way too fast. Match your flow conditions to your heat transfer rate.
 
I'd personally treat it as a simple heat transfer problem. Start with an ideal temperature value at the wall. This'll allow you to determine your ideal heat transfer rate and then the speed of air required to achieve this given the area and flow rate of air through your motor. The equations involved are pretty simple, but it'd give a nice approximation. I've used this method to give me an idea of what values to put into a simulation of the heat transfer occurring on the heat shield of a reentry vehicle.

I was trying to avoid saying how ridiculous those numbers you have are, but I couldn't help myself. Mach 2 speeds inside a cooling system? wtf. Are you trying to cool the sun? At those speeds you'd start creating shock waves, which significantly increase the local heat transfer. You'd be heating the system up much higher than what the system is that you're actually trying to cool. You'd need a cooling sysem for the cooling system. You get other effects too, which I won't go into. You'd have to heat shield the walls, just for a simple electric cooling system.

Thankyou for making work a little interesting.
 
Last edited:
Thats just super sic, eerrrr i mean cool vader.....literally.
 
Thanks for the replys.

I figured anywhere near Mach 1 speed are a bit too high...actually way to high. The best literature for air velocity speed is in the 80-100 ft/s (Compressed air pipes). I did find a few papers that have air velocity speeds in the 250-300 ft/s range but all in experimental applications.

Just some background on my analysis

Pipe model > Hand Calcs > FEA

-Pipe model to find velocities
-Hand Calcs to find h-values using velocities
-FEA to do the simulations using the h-values and mass flow


Currently, I believe 250-300 ft/s would be my upper limit based on the experiment papers that I read.

Then next questions is does anyone have info on reference material on air flow speeds? or can point to the right direction? such as IEEE, ASME, Universities paper etc.

Thanks for reading.
 
Look into ASHRAE.
 
almarsd said:
Thanks for the replys.

I figured anywhere near Mach 1 speed are a bit too high...actually way to high. The best literature for air velocity speed is in the 80-100 ft/s (Compressed air pipes). I did find a few papers that have air velocity speeds in the 250-300 ft/s range but all in experimental applications.

Just some background on my analysis

Pipe model > Hand Calcs > FEA

-Pipe model to find velocities
-Hand Calcs to find h-values using velocities
-FEA to do the simulations using the h-values and mass flowCurrently, I believe 250-300 ft/s would be my upper limit based on the experiment papers that I read.

Then next questions is does anyone have info on reference material on air flow speeds? or can point to the right direction? such as IEEE, ASME, Universities paper etc.

Thanks for reading.

These are higher than the wind speeds inside hurricanes and tornadoes. I realize that the scale of your motor is much smaller than that of cars and houses in storms, but still, do you really want speeds that high? Maybe you should do a deformational mechanics analysis of the metal inside the motor and blades to ascertain structural integrity.
 
Back
Top