Resultant Moment Couple Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a resultant moment couple problem, specifically determining the resultant force R and its line of action on the y-axis. The calculated resultant force is approximately 755.43N at an angle of 44.73°. The approach involves finding the x and y components of the resultant and calculating the resultant moment by combining these components with a given moment of 800Nm. The final distance along the y-axis, derived from the moments, is approximately 1.31m. The participants emphasize that the position of the axis does not affect the final result, and the calculations are confirmed through a detailed breakdown of the equations used.
Rico
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Determine the resultant R and the point on the y-axis through which the line of action of the resultant of the loading system shown passes

I have attached an image of the problem

In my attempt to solve the problem I went about the following steps:
1- I chose my axis to be right in the middle of the 2.4m length along the x axis
2 - Found the x and y components of the resultant force, as well as the magnitude of the resultant and its direction. Rounded off this equaled R = 755.43N and θ = 44.73°
3 - I got lost along this point now: I chose to find out the Resultant x moment and the resultant y moment excluding the moment of 800Nm already given.
4 - I then chose to find resultant moment of the problem by adding the resultant x with the resultant y and then finally adding the 800Nm moment
5 - I then got and answer of - 1340.64... Nm and now I needed to find its position along the y axis, correct? From here I do not know what to do.


Do we make this equation equal to a component of the resultant already worked out or just the resultant. The answer is meant to be 1.31m=y but I can't seem to get this answer.
 

Attachments

  • physics 1.jpg
    physics 1.jpg
    14.4 KB · Views: 617
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Rico. http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

I'm guessing here, but ... what do you find if you translate the line of action of that 755.43N force so that it produces the -1340Nm moment?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello NascentOxygen and thank you :)

I consulted several colleagues at my university today and Turns out you do this:

Find the Rx and Ry components of the resultant and then its magnitude. The position of the axis will not affect your final answer. The question asks for the distance along the y-axis for the action of the resultant. This is a distance along +j and needs to be multiplied by a force to equal the sum of all the moments on the object.

So our equation will be:

d-\hat{j} x Rx\hat{i} = ∑M
∴-dRx=∑MOF
∴d=\frac{∑M}{-R<sub>x</sub>}

This gives us the distance along the y-axis because it is perpendicular to the Rx component.

Note that ∑M was taken about the lowest left point of the frame. Of course the position of the axis wouldn't actually affect the final result, I just saw it as being the easiest.

My Entire equation was then this (for anyone who is interested)

Angle of force
tanθ=\frac{1}{2}
∴θ=26.565051177° -------> I called this equation A for accuracy

Resultant Force - Components, Magnitude, Direction
Rx = 600cosθ
∴Rx = 536.6563146... N -------> B
∴Rx ≈ 536.66 N

Rx = 800 - 600sinθ
∴Rx = 531.6718427... N -------> C
∴Rx ≈ 531.67 N

|R| = √ Rx2 + Rx2
∴|R| = 755.4303067... N
∴|R| ≈ 755.43 N

tanβ = \frac{Ry}{Rx}
∴β = \frac{B}{C}
∴β = 44.73267846... °
∴β ≈ 44.73°

∑MOR = MOF1 + MOF2 + MOF3

∴d\hat{j} x Rx\hat{i} = 2.4\hat{i} x 600sinθ-\hat{j} + 1.6\hat{j} x 600cos\hat{i} + 800

∴-dRx = -2.4(600sinθ) - 1.6(600cosθ) + 800

∴d = \frac{-2.4(600sinθ) - 1.6(600cosθ) + 800}{-600cosθ}

∴d = 1.309288015... m
∴d ≈ 1.31 m


And there it is :) If it had asked for the position along the x-axis then I would've used the Ry component. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top