A Reversed Spot Diagram: Image & Point Source Effects

AI Thread Summary
In optical systems, reversing the imaging and object planes can allow for the extrapolation of new spot sizes from known ones, provided the transition matrix of the system is available. If only forward direction data is known, modeling the system based on initial object and image information is necessary to predict outcomes when the direction is reversed. Magnification alone cannot be used to simply extrapolate spot sizes due to the complexities involved in optical behavior. The discussion highlights challenges with simulation tools like Zemax, which require specific configurations to analyze reversed systems. Ultimately, understanding the system's characteristics is crucial for accurate predictions in optical modeling.
Emperor42
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If you have an optics system where you know the spot diagram of the image at on imaging on one plain and projecting onto another. Where you know the spot size for a point source at a given distance from the centre of the field.

Now if you reverse the system where the imaging plain now becomes the object plain and vice versa, can you extrapolate the new spot sizes from the old ones? Does it depend on the magnification?
Eksma-5Lens-63thick-config.jpg

forum lens.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the transition matrix for the optical system, then yes.
This is exactly the same as just finding the image knowing the object and the optical system.

If you do not, instead you only only know what happens when experiments are done in the forward direction (ie spot pattern A turns into image spot pattern A'), then you will need to model the optical system using knowledge of the initial object and the initial image.
From there you can deduce the expected result of reversing the direction given the model and the assumptions the model is derived from.
This sort of thing occupies much of science and it is a foundational postulate of scientifiic investigation that this approach is useful.
 
If I know the magnification of the system, can I just extrapolate the size of the spots if I reverse the image and optical plain, by just multiplying their size by the magnification factor? Because of the reversibility factor of optics.
 
In general - no. There can be anything in the box marked "system".
Compare the result with a simple lens with that for a telescope.
 
Hmm... its just difficult because the way Zemax works you have to have the image and object plain inverted for it to work for some reason. I can't reverse the black box lens so I'm left in a situation where I know roughly the quality of the lens, but I can't measure exactly how the spots will look on my CCD.
 
Oh you are asking how to do it in the simulator??
No idea. Like you said, you'd have to reverse the order of the componets in the black box unless you can get hold of the transfer matrix directly, then you just invert it.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top