Reversible Processes: Quasi-Static Adiabatic Expansion from Callen Ch. 4

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the quasi-static adiabatic expansion of a monatomic ideal gas in a cylinder, focusing on the relationship between energy change and entropy. The user is confused about how to demonstrate that the change in entropy (dS) is zero during this process, indicating that it is isentropic and reversible. They recognize the need to apply thermodynamic principles and the provided equation (3.34) to relate changes in internal energy and volume to entropy. The user suggests an approach involving the differentiation of entropy with respect to internal energy and volume, while considering the specific characteristics of monatomic ideal gases. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of applying thermodynamic relationships to solve the problem effectively.
mateomy
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
I'm working from Callen ch. 4:

Consider a monatomic ideal gas in a cylinder fitted with a piston.The walls of the cylinder and the piston are adiabatic. The system is initially in equilibrium, but the external pressure is slowly decreased. The energy change of the gas in the resultant expansion dV is dU = -PdV . Show, from equation 3.34, that dS = 0, so that the quasi-static adiabatic expansion is isentropic and reversible.

Equation 3.34 is defined as:
<br /> S = Ns_o + NRln\left[\left(\frac{U}{U_o}\right)^{c} \left(\frac{V}{V_o}\right) \left(\frac{N}{N_o}\right)^{-(c+1)}\right]<br />

I'm completely lost as to what this question is asking me. I see the dS = 0 and I think, 'Well they were just talking about thermodynamic configuration space and for dS to be zero..." and then I try to take derivatives. But, I don't know with respect to what, the volume? I'm not looking for answers (not that anybody should be), I just want some guidance on how to tackle this problem.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the approach should be something like:
S = S(U,V) => dS = dS/dU dU + dS/dV dV
now use what you know about "monatomic ideal gasses"
and the fact dU =-P dV to show the terms in dS cancel.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I'll give that a shot. Thank you for the pointer.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top