Reversing the order of integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikeyrichster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
mikeyrichster
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi I am trying to evaluate a line integral, and i need to reverse the order of integration, i'll call the function f(x) as it doesn't matter too much. and the bounds are:

double integral f(x) dxdy where inner integral is from x=y^2/a to x=y and the outer integral is from y=0 to y=a (where a is a positive constant)

talk about a headache! I've done the best i can and i came up with:

double integral fx dydx where inner integral is from y=sqrt(xa) to y=x and the outer integral is from x=0 to x=a

but i don't think this is right because when i use this for f(x) i get an impossible answer (ill spare you the details)

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi mikeyrichster! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and an integral: ∫ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
mikeyrichster said:
Hi I am trying to evaluate a line integral …

erm :redface:

… noooo! :biggrin:
double integral f(x) dxdy where inner integral is from x=y^2/a to x=y and the outer integral is from y=0 to y=a (where a is a positive constant)

talk about a headache! I've done the best i can and i came up with:

double integral fx dydx where inner integral is from y=sqrt(xa) to y=x and the outer integral is from x=0 to x=a
The area is from (0,0) to (a,a), to the right of the curve x = y2/a, and to the left of the the straight line,

which is the same as above the straight line and below the curve,

so your solution looks ok to me (except that the inner limits are the wrong way round). :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top