Revisiting the Flaws of the Light Clock in Special and General Relativity

  • #201


Passionflower said:
Hmm, out of curiosity I checked it, when we have:

\alpha = 329,356,000 m/s^2

\tau = 1 sIt is rather high but on the other hand if we consider the maximum acceleration from QT perspective then we should get to somewhere in the 5.56 x 1051 m/s2 region.

Plenty of playroom it seems :-p

You mean, for a rocket carrying atomic clocks ?
That has to turn around from +0.8c to -0.8c?
Do you think anything would be left out of the rocket and the clocks? :-)
I get a coordinate velocity of 0.8 and a coordinate acceleration of 7488461 m/s[sup2[/sup] about 2.3% or the proper acceleration.

This is incorrect since a=\frac{\alpha}{\gamma^3} where \gamma=1/0.6. Your result is off by one order of magnitude.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #202


starthaus said:
This is incorrect since a=\frac{\alpha}{\gamma^3} where \gamma=1.33. Your result is off by one order of magnitude.
Oh? I get a gamma of 1 2/3 not 1 1/3

How did you get 1 1/3?
The proper velocity is 1 1/3
 
  • #203


Passionflower said:
Oh? I get a gamma of 1 2/3 not 1 1/3

How did you get 1 1/3?
The proper velocity is 1 1/3
\beta=0.8
\gamma=1/0.6
 
  • #204


starthaus said:
\gamma=1/0.6
Wait, hold on...

Yes that is 1 2/3 not 1 1/3 right?
 
  • #205


Passionflower said:
0.6? You mean 0.8 right?

No, I mean exactly what I wrote above.
 
  • #206


starthaus said:
No, I mean exactly what I wrote above.
No ignore that.

1/0.6 = 1 2/3 right?
 
  • #207


Passionflower said:
No ignore that.

1/0.6 = 1 2/3 right?

Yes, whatever 1/0.6 comes out to be. Your coordinate acceleration is off by a factor of 10.
 
  • #208


starthaus said:
Yes, whatever 1/0.6 comes out to be. Your coordinate acceleration is off by a factor of 10.
Hold on, so now we agree that gamma is 1 2/3

Ok, you are right, I see what happened the coordinate acceleration is in ly/y^2 and alpha is in m/s^2.

In ly/y^2:

Alpha is: 34,668,889 ly/y^2
A is: 7488460.769 ly/y^2

With a ratio of 21,6%

Good spotting!
 
  • #209


Passionflower said:
Hold on, so now we agree that gamma is 1 2/3

Ok, you are right, I see what happened the coordinate acceleration is in ly/y^2 and alpha is in m/s^2.

In ly/y^2:

Alpha is: 34,668,889 ly/y^2
A is: 7488460.769 ly/y^2

With a ratio of 21,6%

Good spotting!

I knew we'll agree.
 
  • #210


starthaus said:
I knew we'll agree.
Yes in math there is no middle between true and false!
 
Back
Top