Rigid Objects In Static Equilibrium: Mass on a Bar

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a uniform rod in static equilibrium, supported by a cable at an angle, with friction at the wall. The goal is to determine the minimum distance from a point on the rod where an additional weight can be hung without causing slippage.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the addition of weights in the equations and the implications for torque calculations. There are questions about the correct interpretation of forces and the role of the coefficient of friction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the equations and the interpretation of forces, while others are clarifying terms and correcting misunderstandings. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the coefficient of static friction and its distinction from frictional force. Clarifications about the setup, such as the location of point A and the angles involved, are also being discussed.

mickellowery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


One end of a uniform 4.00m long rod of weight Fg is supported by a cable. The cable is attached to the bar at an angle of 37.0o. The other end of the bar rests against the wall where its held by friction. The coefficient of static friction between the wall and the rod is [tex]\mu[/tex]s=0.500. Determine the minimum distance x from point A at which an additional object with the same weight Fg can be hung without causing the rod to slip off the wall.


Homework Equations


[tex]\Sigma[/tex]Fx= Fh-Tcos37=0
[tex]\Sigma[/tex]Fy= 0.500-Fgo-Fgb+Tsin37=0
[tex]\Sigma[/tex][tex]\tau[/tex]z= x(Fgo)-2(Fgb)+4Tsin14=0

Since the two weights are equal can I add them together in the equations and call it 2F? I was thinking I couldn't do this because the additional object's weight will be in a different area than the center of gravity of the beam. Also my subscripts are go is the object and gb is the beam. Fh is the horizontal force of the wall on the beam.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
For finding the net force you should be able to just add the x and y components of each force together. For the torque, you'll have to take into account where each force is acting.
 
mickellowery said:

Homework Statement


One end of a uniform 4.00m long rod of weight Fg is supported by a cable. The cable is attached to the bar at an angle of 37.0o. The other end of the bar rests against the wall where its held by friction. The coefficient of static friction etween the wall and the rod is [tex]\mu[/tex]s=0.500. Determine the minimum distance x from point A at which an additional object with the same weight Fg can be hung without causing the rod to slip off the wall.


Homework Equations


[tex]\Sigma[/tex]Fx= Fh-Tcos37=0
[tex]\Sigma[/tex]Fy= 0.500-Fgo-Fgb+Tsin37=0
[tex]\Sigma[/tex][tex]\tau[/tex]z= x(Fgo)-2(Fgb)+4Tsin14=0

Since the two weights are equal can I add them together in the equations and call it 2F? I was thinking I couldn't do this because the additional object's weight will be in a different area than the center of gravity of the beam. Also my subscripts are go is the object and gb is the beam. Fh is the horizontal force of the wall on the beam.

The Attempt at a Solution


Where is the point A?
0.5 is coefficient of friction. Not frictional force. f=0.5N
 
Oh sorry its the minimum distance away from the wall.
 
mickellowery said:
Oh sorry its the minimum distance away from the wall.

According to your Eqns.,first eqn. is correct. Fh=normal force=horizontal force
2nd eqn. is in correct.
F(g)=F(go)=F(go)
Don't write a lot of unknown values. Take F(g).
[tex]\sumF<sub>y</sub>[/tex]= 0.500Fh-Fg-Fg+Tsin37=0

3rd eqn.(how do you get Tsin14?)angle is 37 degree
change Tsin37
instead of Fgo and Fgb , write Fg
So you can get the answer.
 
Alright thanks much Inky. I don't know where the 14 came from. I guess I have to make a stupid math mistake so I'll just substitute in nonexistent numbers.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K