Rigorous Introductory physics textbook

AI Thread Summary
An inquiry into finding a mathematically rigorous introductory physics textbook highlights a dissatisfaction with common texts that lack precision in their mathematical treatment. The discussion suggests alternatives that align with a mathematical background, including "Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics" by V.I. Arnold for classical mechanics, "Lectures on Quantum Theory: Mathematical and Structural Foundations" by Chris Isham for quantum mechanics, and "The Geometry of Minkowski Spacetime" by Gregory Naber for special relativity. These recommendations emphasize clarity and correctness in mathematical concepts, catering to those who prioritize rigorous approaches in their study of physics.
Riemannliness
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering if anybody knows about or has used a good introductory physics textbook that is mathematically rigorous. I'm really interested in physics, but I'm a mathematics student and I CAN'T STAND any of the books I've tried to use so far (eg. Knight's Physics). I've really grown to dislike texts that continually do things that are mathematically sketchy (or outright incorrect) but are "good enough for the purposes/scope/level of this textbook".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know any book that fits that description, but there are a few about specific areas of physics that you might like, for example "Mathematical methods of classical mechanics", by V.I. Arnold. For quantum mechanics, you might like "Lectures on quantum theory: Mathematical and structural foundations", by Chris Isham. It's supposed to be a fairly easy read, so it's not exactly filled with rigorous proofs, but it's at least not giving you the wrong ideas about anything. For special relativity, consider "The geometry of Minkowski spacetime", by Gregory Naber.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top