RL parallel circuit. No value given

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a circuit analysis problem involving a parallel circuit with resistors and an inductor. Participants are tasked with calculating various electrical parameters such as voltages, power, and currents, while navigating the complexities of AC circuit analysis without specific numerical values provided.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using the voltage divider rule to find the voltage at points A and B, while others express uncertainty about the calculations.
  • There is a discussion about the expression for the voltage across the inductor, with some participants proposing that it can be represented as V = I·XL∠+90°.
  • One participant mentions the need to express the total current as a vector sum of individual currents in the parallel circuit.
  • Several participants attempt to derive expressions for active and reactive power dissipated in the circuit, with varying degrees of confidence in their calculations.
  • There is confusion regarding the use of complex numbers and phasors, with participants seeking clarification on how to apply these concepts to their calculations.
  • Some participants correct earlier statements or calculations, but the correctness of these corrections is not established as a consensus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the calculations and methods to be used, indicating that multiple competing approaches exist. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the correct methods or final answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific numerical values, which complicates their ability to provide definitive answers. There are also references to the need for assumptions and the importance of expressing results in terms of magnitudes and angles.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals studying AC circuit analysis, particularly those interested in the application of complex numbers and phasors in electrical engineering contexts.

  • #31
just wonder is 1 or -1 ?

if -1 then 63.43°
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #33
magnitude is (-2jRXL) / (R^2+XL^2) Vertical = imaginary

angle is (v/2) * [ (R^2 - XL^2)/(R^2+XL^2) Horizontal = real
 
  • #34
stepfanie said:
magnitude is (-2jRXL) / (R^2+XL^2) Vertical = imaginary

angle is (v/2) * [ (R^2 - XL^2)/(R^2+XL^2) Horizontal = real
It seems that you don't know what is meant by magnitude or angle of a vector?

A complex number can be regarded as a vector with its real part drawn horizontally and the imaginary part drawn vertically. The magnitude is the length of that vector.
 
  • #35
hi Nascent ,would the magnitude be √( (R^2-XL^2)^2+ (-2jRXL)^2)?

while the angle be θ=(tan^-1(-2jRXL/(R^2-XL^2)))° ?

cheers :)
 
Last edited:
  • #36
sqrt of ( (R^2-XL^2)^2+ (-2jRXL)^2)

but the angle.
 
  • #37
Sam 007 said:
hi Nascent ,would the magnitude be √( (R^2-XL^2)^2+ (-2jRXL)^2)?
No, you have left out something major.
while the angle be θ=tan^-1(-2jRXL/(R^2-XL^2))° ?
There is no j in either magnitude or angle. You drop the j. There won't be a degree symbol where you wrote it, either.
 
  • #38
NascentOxygen said:
No, you have left out something major.



There is no j in either magnitude or angle. You drop the j. There won't be a degree symbol where you wrote it, either.



is it the denominator (R^2 + XL^2) ?
 
  • #39
ok so would the magnitude be
√( ((R^2-XL^2)/(R^2+XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(R^2+XL^2)) ^2 )?while the angle be θ=tan^-1(-2RXL/(R^2-XL^2)) ?

Thanks :)
 
  • #40
Sam 007 said:
ok so would the magnitude be
√( ((R^2-XL^2)/(R^2+XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(R^2+XL^2)) ^2 )?
Wasn't there a factor of 2 in the denominator?
while the angle be θ=tan^-1(-2RXL/(R^2-XL^2)) ? ✔[/size][/color]
 
  • #41
√(((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(2R^2+2XL^2)) ^2 ) or

√(((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-RXL/(R^2+XL^2)) ^2 )

? :)
 
Last edited:
  • #42
Sam 007 said:
√(((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(2R^2+2XL^2)) ^2 ) ? how about now :)
That looks right. You could take out the common denominator.
 
  • #43
Cool thanks so much for the help Nascent :)
 
  • #44
There is supposed to be a V in front of all that, too, if this is Va-Vb.
 
  • #45
so the magnitude = V sqrt of ((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-RXL/(R^2+XL^2)) ^2 )

that's it right? :D
 
  • #46
hmm should it be since its the magnitude of Vab

V*√(((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(2R^2+2XL^2)) ^2 ) or


√(V*((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(2R^2+2XL^2)) ^2 ) or


√(V^2*((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(2R^2+2XL^2)) ^2 ) ?
 
  • #47
stepfanie said:
so the magnitude = V sqrt of ((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-RXL/(R^2+XL^2)) ^2 )

that's it right? :D
Yes.
 
  • #48
for f) calculate the power factor of the circuit.

power factor = true power / apparent power which is (I^2 *R) / (I^2 *Z)

so i can use the equation in c) which is the active power dissipated in each resistance divide by d) which is the reactive power dissipated in XL by using power factor formula.

am i right ?
 
  • #49
V·√(((R^2-XL^2)/(2R^2+2XL^2))^2 + (-2RXL/(2R^2+2XL^2)) ^2 )

Something seems wrong.

That whole expression simplifies to V/2. That can't be right? But I think it is right!

That makes things easier! :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #50
stepfanie said:
for f) calculate the power factor of the circuit.

power factor = true power / apparent power which is (I^2 *R) / (I^2 *Z)

so i can use the equation in c) which is the active power dissipated in each resistance divide by d) which is the reactive power dissipated in XL by using power factor formula.

am i right ?
c) active power dissipated in each resisance
formula p=(I^2)*R

[( V∠0 (3R+Xl∠90 )) / ( 3R+2RXl∠90 )]^2 *R

d) reactive power dissipated in XL
Q=I^2 * jXL

[( V∠0 (3R+Xl∠90 )) / ( 3R+2RXl∠90 )]^2 * Xl∠90

so for Power Factor

P/Q =

[(( V∠0 (3R+Xl∠90 )) / ( 3R+2RXl∠90 ))^2 *R] / [(( V∠0 (3R+Xl∠90 )) / ( 3R+2RXl∠90 ))^2 * Xl∠90 ]

is it correct ? :)
 
Last edited:
  • #51
stepfanie said:
c) active power dissipated in each resisance
formula p=(I^2)*R
yes
[( V∠0 (3R+Xl∠90 )) / ( 3R+2RXl∠90 )]^2 *R
But I don't like the look of that.
d) reactive power dissipated in XL
Q=I^2 * jXL
Yes, without the j.
[( V∠0 (3R+Xl∠90 )) / ( 3R+2RXl∠90 )]^2 * Xl∠90
I don't think so.

You will have to work out the current through the R-XL branch in order to determine the power in that resistor, and reactive power in that XL. Use complex algebra (real + j imaginary) to do this, since you've learned that method.
 
  • #52
C) active power in each resistor?
P=V^2/R1
P=V^2/R2
P=V^2/R3
XL has no active power
D) Reactive power?

Q= V^2/XL

E) Total current
It=V/R1+V/R2+V/R3+V/XL

not sure?
 
Last edited:
  • #53
for d)

Q=|V^2| / XL

v= (jXL / (R + jXL)) *v -> voltage divider rule.

v= (jVXL)/ (R+ jXL)

v^2 = [ (jVXL)/ (R+ jXL) ] ^2

v = (j^2 V^2 XL^2) / ((R + jXL)^2)

v= (-V^2 XL^2) / ((R + jXL)^2)

so sub V into Q=|V^2| / XL

Q= [(-V^2 XL^2) / ((R + jXL)^2)] / XL

Q= (-V^2 XL^2) / (XL*((R + jXL)^2)) ->VAR

am i right? :/
 
  • #54
Sam 007 said:
C) active power in each resistor?
P=V^2/R1
P=V^2/R2
P=V^2/R3
XL has no active power
D) Reactive power?

Q= V^2/XL

E) Total current
It=V/R1+V/R2+V/R3+V/XL

not sure?

for c) we not need to calculate the total P ? just P in each resistance ? :rolleyes:

and for b) we just use the magnitude of Vab and how about the XL ?
 
  • #55
I don't really think you have to use Vab from part B for part C just the voltage V∠0°

Yeah for part C. just calculate the power in each resistance, XL is not a resistor its an inductor has no resistance.

But than again I am not sure will have to ask nascent
 
  • #56
Sam 007 said:
I don't really think you have to use Vab from part B for part C just the voltage V∠0°

Yeah for part C. just calculate the power in each resistance, XL is not a resistor its an inductor has no resistance.

But than again I am not sure will have to ask nascent

thank you.

but if i want to find the total active power ? what will it be..
and can u solve d)? I am not sure I am doing correctly.
 
  • #57
well this is the way I would do it but stephanie I think it may not be right


P=V^2/R1+V^2/R2+V^2/R3
 
  • #58
Sam 007 said:
well this is the way I would do it but stephanie I think it may not be right


P=V^2/R1+V^2/R2+V^2/R3

this is what i got as well.
 
  • #59
Sam 007 said:
well this is the way I would do it but stephanie I think it may not be right

P=V^2/R1+V^2/R2+V^2/R3
That could only be right iff there is a voltage of amplitude V across each individual element, R1, R2, and R3, and there isn't. None has V volts across itself.

But for the series pair R-R you can say V volts exists across that pair.
 
  • #60
stepfanie said:
for d)

Q=|V^2| / XL

v= (jXL / (R + jXL)) *v -> voltage divider rule.
https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon14.gif That's the right way for finding the voltage across the inductance. Now convert this to a vector having a magnitude and an angle. Power calculations involve the square the magnitude of the voltage across any element. https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon6.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K