What Equation Should I Use for Calculating Total Impedance in RLC Circuits?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate total impedance in RLC circuits, two main equations are discussed: one for parallel complex impedances and another for the magnitude of impedance in parallel resistor-capacitor-inductor setups. The first equation is used for combining complex impedances, while the second is applicable for calculating the magnitude of impedance when components are connected in parallel. It is essential to first determine the individual complex impedances before applying the first equation to find the total impedance. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of using complex numbers for accurate calculations in these scenarios. Understanding the context and application of these equations is crucial for solving advanced RLC circuit problems.
Mrhu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello again!

We have been given a couple of more advanced problems where the components are placed in series parallely.

Check the image, the question is regarding what equation to use, in order to calculate the total impedance of the circuit.

Homework Equations


I have stumbled upon the following equations...
Z_{tot}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{Z_{1}}+\frac{1}{Z_{2}}}

And the same equation, only squared and partly modified

Z_{tot}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{1}{R})^{2}+(\frac{1}{X_{L}}-\frac{1}{X_{C}})^{2}}}



The Attempt at a Solution



If you take a look at the image you will see two examples, my theory is that the second equation is valid for the first example.

But when does one use the first equation? And can the second equation be used on the second example, and vice versa?

Many thanks in advance, please do use real numbers when explaining. I am aware of the importance of complex numbers in RLC circuits we have not applied them in Physics yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first equation refers to the complex resultant impedance Z if two complex impedances, Z1 and Z2 are connected in parallel. The second one shows the magnitude Z of the resultant impedance of parallel connected resistor, capacitor and inductor. The identical notation is confusing.



ehild
 
ehild said:
The first equation refers to the complex resultant impedance Z if two complex impedances, Z1 and Z2 are connected in parallel. The second one shows the magnitude Z of the resultant impedance of parallel connected resistor, capacitor and inductor. The identical notation is confusing.



ehild

Thank you for the quick reply.

Yes, it is a bit confusing.

If you look at the picture (example 2), should I first calculate the part-impedances, then add them using the first equation in order to achieve the total impedance?

Thanks ehild
 

Attachments

  • qKfUf.png
    qKfUf.png
    18.8 KB · Views: 538
Last edited:
You can not solve example 2 without using complex impedances. Yes, you need to calculate the complex Z1 and Z2 separately, then add them as complex numbers, according to the first equation.

\hat Z_1=R+iX_L

\hat Z_2=i(X_L-X_C)

The reciprocal impedances add up:

\frac{1}{\hat Z}=\frac{1}{\hat Z_1}+\frac{1}{\hat Z_2}

You get the magnitude by multiplying by the complex conjugate and then take the square root.

ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top