Rod Hanging in Water: Find Line of Buoyancy Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter Horvath Bela
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the line of action of the buoyancy force acting on a rod partially immersed in water at a 60-degree angle. The buoyancy force is equal to the weight of the displaced water, which corresponds to the volume of the submerged portion of the rod. It is clarified that the line of action of the buoyancy force is located at the center of the immersed part of the rod, not at the center of mass of the entire rod. This is crucial for calculating torque, as the rod is in equilibrium and the net torque must be zero. Understanding the buoyancy force's line of action is essential for solving the problem effectively.
Horvath Bela
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Lets consider a rod of length l that is attached at a point to the cealing and relvolves freely. Half of the rod is immersed in water and half of it is out of the water. The rod is not vertical it has around a 60 degree angle to the water. Where is the line of action of the boyuancy force? Is it at the CM of the rod or is it at the center of ther part immersed in water? Why? I drew a picture hope it is understandible: https://imgur.com/a/6uxtO

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Horvath Bela said:

Homework Statement


Lets consider a rod of length l that is attached at a point to the cealing and relvolves freely. Half of the rod is immersed in water and half of it is out of the water. The rod is not vertical it has around a 60 degree angle to the water. Where is the line of action of the boyuancy force? Is it at the CM of the rod or is it at the center of ther part immersed in water? Why? I drew a picture hope it is understandible: https://imgur.com/a/6uxtO

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

You are required to complete the template. List any standard equations or laws that are likely relevant and show some attempt.
 
I am really qlueless as for the line of action of the force. I know the magnitude of the bouyancy force it is equal to the weight of the displaced water which is the half of the volume of the rod and times 1000 kg/m^3. The line of action is important because this a torque problem and since the rod is in equalibrium the net torque is zero, but to calculate the torque of the bouyancy force I would need to know its lever. I hope this shows you that I have considered the problem. Would you please tell me where the line of action of the bouyancy force is?
 
Horvath Bela said:
I am really qlueless as for the line of action of the force. I know the magnitude of the bouyancy force it is equal to the weight of the displaced water which is the half of the volume of the rod and times 1000 kg/m^3. The line of action is important because this a torque problem and since the rod is in equalibrium the net torque is zero, but to calculate the torque of the bouyancy force I would need to know its lever. I hope this shows you that I have considered the problem. Would you please tell me where the line of action of the bouyancy force is?
No, but I will help you figure it out.
Consider removing the rod and filling in the space that leaves in the water with... more water. Clearly this would be in equilibrium. What is the weight of the added water, and where is the line of action of that weight?
 
The weight of the added water is equal to what the bouyance force was, and the line of action is where the center of the immersed part of the rod used to be.
 
Horvath Bela said:
The weight of the added water is equal to what the bouyance force was, and the line of action is where the center of the immersed part of the rod used to be.
Yes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top