Rod with current and magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of a rod that rolls along parallel rails while carrying a current in a magnetic field. The initial approach using force and acceleration was deemed insufficient, leading to a focus on torque and energy methods. The user derived the relationship between work done on the rod and its kinetic energy, ultimately arriving at the equation for velocity. A key point of confusion was why the rod's radius does not factor into the final speed calculation, despite its presence in the moment of inertia. The conclusion highlights the surprising nature of the result, emphasizing the interplay between linear and rotational dynamics.
gsquare567
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rod of mass m and radius R rests on two parallel rails that are a distance d apart and have a length L. The rod carries a current I and rolls along the rails without slipping. A uniform magnetic field B is directed perpendicular to the road and the rails, pointing downwards. If it starts from rest, what is the speed of the rod as it leaves the rails.


Homework Equations


(1) F = I L x B = ma
(2) torque = r x F


The Attempt at a Solution


By subbing in the given constants into (1), I get a = IdB/m. However, I think that I need to use equation 2 instead. I am wondering how to relate the torque on the rod to the velocity of the rod. I don't think the the acceleration I got applies to the rod, because it receives its motion due to torque, rather than just the magnetic force.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It could be done with force and torque, but I think the easier way is to
- calculate the force on the rod and work done over the distance L
- work = linear kinetic energy + rotational energy
- solve for v, which will appear in both energy terms
 
ok, let me see if i got it straight:

W = Krotational + Ktranslational = 1/2Iw^2 + 1/2mv^2 = 1/2(1/2mR^2)(v/R)^2 + 1/2mv^2 = 3/4mv^2
and
W = F * d = (IdB)(L)
so
3/4mv^2 = IdBL
v = 2/sqrt(3) sqrt(IdBL/m)
now my question is, why doesn't the radius of the rod, R, matter? did i use the right moment of inertia and angular velocity?
 
It looks correct to me. The calculation itself "explains" why R doesn't appear in the answer I guess. A wee bit surprising, though.
 
Interesting. Thanks for all your help!
 
Most welcome.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top