Roller Coaster Problem with KE and PE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to the conservation of energy in a roller coaster scenario, focusing on kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE). The user expresses uncertainty about the problem's language and whether the equation PEb + KEb = KEa + PEa is applicable. They attempt to derive the relationship between energies at different points, suggesting that the work done by gravity equals the change in kinetic energy. Clarification is sought on calculating potential energy at various points and the correct application of the work-energy principle. The conversation emphasizes understanding energy transformations in the context of roller coasters.
chris61986
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



https://dl.dropbox.com/u/92857534/physicsproblem.png

Note: Solving for part D and E

Homework Equations



Unsure. Langauge in the problem seems ambiguous.
Perhaps (KE + PE)b = (KE + PE)a

The Attempt at a Solution



So I think it's done this way.

From A to B and B to C, the equation would look this way:
PEb + KEb = KEa + PEa
PEa = 0, move KEb to right side, left with:
PEb = KEa - KEb
so WGH = 1/2mv'^2 - 1/2mv^2

Am I going the right way about this? If so, where do I go from here when I don't know both velocities?
Also, for parts A, B, and C, it's simply W = mgΔh, correct? I'm not used to things being easy :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Work energy rule says that the increase in kinetic energy of a body is equal to work done on it.
 
Do you think you could be a little less cryptic?
 
Work done by gravity is equal to the increase in kinetic energy of the car. The same is the loss in potential energy. W = mgΔh is correct.
In second part I think potential energy is to be calculated at different points.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top