Roller Coaster Problem with KE and PE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to the conservation of energy in a roller coaster scenario, focusing on kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE). The user expresses uncertainty about the problem's language and whether the equation PEb + KEb = KEa + PEa is applicable. They attempt to derive the relationship between energies at different points, suggesting that the work done by gravity equals the change in kinetic energy. Clarification is sought on calculating potential energy at various points and the correct application of the work-energy principle. The conversation emphasizes understanding energy transformations in the context of roller coasters.
chris61986
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



https://dl.dropbox.com/u/92857534/physicsproblem.png

Note: Solving for part D and E

Homework Equations



Unsure. Langauge in the problem seems ambiguous.
Perhaps (KE + PE)b = (KE + PE)a

The Attempt at a Solution



So I think it's done this way.

From A to B and B to C, the equation would look this way:
PEb + KEb = KEa + PEa
PEa = 0, move KEb to right side, left with:
PEb = KEa - KEb
so WGH = 1/2mv'^2 - 1/2mv^2

Am I going the right way about this? If so, where do I go from here when I don't know both velocities?
Also, for parts A, B, and C, it's simply W = mgΔh, correct? I'm not used to things being easy :P
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Work energy rule says that the increase in kinetic energy of a body is equal to work done on it.
 
Do you think you could be a little less cryptic?
 
Work done by gravity is equal to the increase in kinetic energy of the car. The same is the loss in potential energy. W = mgΔh is correct.
In second part I think potential energy is to be calculated at different points.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top