What is the theoretical maximum distance for a rotating wheel with added weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter supamanc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating Wheel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the theoretical maximum distance a rotating wheel can travel when a weight is dropped into it. The user has successfully rolled the wheel an average of 55 meters, with a maximum of 61.3 meters, using a 2.2 kg weight. Key concepts include converting the potential energy of the weight into kinetic energy of the wheel and understanding the role of rolling friction. To determine the maximum distance, the user needs to find the coefficient of rolling friction for wood on concrete and calculate the energy required for one revolution. By combining these calculations, they aim to establish a theoretical maximum distance accounting for friction.
supamanc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


this is not really a homework question, but it would make a good one!. i posted it in the classical mechanics forum, but did not seem to get much help

i have a two wheel rims, 50mm thick, (ouside radius 500mm, inside 475mm) connected by 8 horizontal spokes. between two of the spokes on opposite sides of the wheel are basket holders, such that the wheel is in perfect balance, and when a weight is dropped in one basket the wheel revolves and moves forwards, dropping the weight when it reaches the bottom of the wheel (the other basket is for symmetry/balance) by using a 2.2 kg weight i have had the wheel roll an average of 55m (61.3 max!) it takes 2.4 secs to complete one revolution, giving an RPM of 25

my question is how can i work out the theoretical maximum distance i should be able to get from the weight?

Homework Equations


not really sure, this is what i am trying to find! i know
I = 1/2m(r12 + r22)
angular velocity = v * r
do not know how to work out friction, or how to take it into account

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not studying physics, and have very little knowledge of it, bar what my internet research has turned up, so i really do not have a clue where to start. some relevant formulas or a link to a good instructional site would be appreciated, thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically friction is directly proportional to the weight of the object. When the wheel rolls, it experiences rolling friction (as opposed to sliding friction). What you're essentially doing is converting the potential energy of the weight into the kinetic energy of the wheel.

Since the outside radius of the wheel is 0.5 m, the potential energy of the weight is 2.2*9.8*0.5 (mgh where m is the mass of the wheel, g is the constant of gravitation and h is the height of the object). This is converted into kinetic energy given by K=\frac{1}{2}Iw^2, where w is the angular velocity of the wheel.

You are going to have to determine the coefficient of friction to get a theoretical expression for the maximum distance traveled. Do you have a general idea of what you need to do?
 
mmmmm let's see!
i now know the kinetic energy of the wheel, and by calculating the energy required for one revolution, i can calculate the maximum possible number of revs, thus the maximum possible distance, without friction.

i need the find the coefficient of rolling friction for wood on concrete. my wheel rims are 6mm thick, and combined with the weight of the wheel, i should be able to find the friction, yes? (dont know how yet though)

by then combining the two equations and solving for when k=0, i can work out my max distance with friction? hope this sounds reasonable!

ps, thank you for the help so far!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top