Rotation of rigid bodies: yo-yo

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity of a yo-yo after it falls a height h, using Newton's second law. The user applies the equation F = ma to the combined mass of the yo-yo and derives the net force and torque equations. They calculate the moment of inertia for the two cylinders and derive a formula for linear acceleration, which turns out to be constant. The conversation highlights that since acceleration is constant, the final velocity can be determined using the relationship between distance fallen and constant acceleration. The final insight connects gravitational acceleration to the derived linear acceleration, suggesting a straightforward approach to find the final velocity.
syang9
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
consider a yo-yo consisting of two cylinders of radius R1, (combined) mass M1, glued to another smaller cylinder of radius R2, mass M2. find the final velocity after falling a height h using Newton's second law. assume the string is vertical.

Chapter1229.gif


the inner radius R2 is R0, the outer radius R1 is R in this picture

so, i started off by applying f = ma to M2..

Fnet, y = (M1 + M2) - T = (M1 + M2)(a)cm

tnet, ext = T(R1) = I(alpha), alpha = (a)cm/R1

i calculated the moment of inertial to be the sum of the moments of inertia of the cylinders..

I = 1/2*(M1*R1^2 + M2*R2^2)

solving for (a)cm, i get a very nasty formula..

a = (M1 + M2)g / ( ( I/(2R1^2)) + (M1 + M2))

my original plan was to integrate this wrt time to get a velocity.
but this formula doesn't involve anything that changes with time.. so how do i obtain the final velocity? am i even on the right track?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks ok.
As you noticed, the expression for a doesn't involve anything that changes wrt time. In other words, a is constant!

If you had an object that was falling under gravity, what would its velocity be after having fallen a distance h?

So then, what if g = a?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top