Rotation Operator: Interaction between Two-Level Atom in {|g>, |e>} Basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter zDrajCa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Rotation
zDrajCa
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded to use the Homework Help Template when starting threads in the schoolwork forums
Hi, I'm working on the interaction between a two level atom (|g>, |e>)
In my exercise we have to use the rotation operator :

R(t)=exp[i(σz+1)ωt/2]

with σz the pauli matrix which is in the {|g>,|e>} basis :
(1 0)
(0 -1)

If i want to represent my rotation operator in the {|g>,|e>} basis. Then i can do:
σz +1 = (1 is the identity matrix)
( 2 0)
( 0 0)

Do my operator is :
(exp(iwt) 0 )
( 0 exp(0) )

Thanks for your answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with taking exponential of a matrix. But if you had exp(0) in the lower right position, would it also be exp(0) in the upper right and lower left?
 
i have read that if a matrix was diagonal (my case right) ,then the exponential of the matrix is the exponential of his diagonal term
 
scottdave said:
I'm not familiar with taking exponential of a matrix. But if you had exp(0) in the lower right position, would it also be exp(0) in the upper right and lower left?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_exponential
It can be expanded in a Taylor series.
zDrajCa said:
the exponential of the matrix is the exponential of his diagonal term
Yes, this is right.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top