Rotation qns which i am stuck for 2 hours

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Stuck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a gymnast tossing a hoop with a backward spin. The key challenge is determining the minimum backward angular velocity required for the hoop to eventually spin back, considering the effects of friction. The net torque acting on the hoop is not zero due to friction, complicating the application of angular momentum conservation. The conversation highlights the relationship between translational and rotational kinetic energy, particularly when the hoop is on the verge of rolling backward. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding torque and energy conservation in solving the problem.
Wen
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I have been stuck at this qns for 2 hours.

A gymnast often toss a hoop forward while giving it a backward spin. the hoop has a radius R and mass M, and is thrown forward with speed V. Find the minimum backward angular velocity w the gymnast must give in order to make sure it spin back eventually . Take both its static and kinectic coefficent of friction to be #.

Since friction is acting , its nett torque is not 0. Hence conserv. of angular momentum cannot be applied.

if its nett torque is Mg#R, how should i relate this to the translational and rotational K.E.?

Please teach me how to solve this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if the torque is taken about contact point(bottum) then torque due to all three forces is zero and we can conserve angular momentum.
 
so 1/2 I w^2= 1/2 MV^2 ?
 
yes, the kinetic energy of a rolling object is, as you have stated:
KE_{rolling} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}I{\omega}^2

if the object is on the veeeeeeerge of rolling backwards, or back to the thrower, the inequality you have stated works.

Regards,

Nenad
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top