Rotational Kinetic Energy of a flywheel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rotational kinetic energy of a flywheel designed to replace an automobile engine. The flywheel has a mass of 200 kg and a radius of 0.40 m, leading to a calculated rotational inertia of 16 kg·m. The user initially attempted to calculate the kinetic energy using the formula KE = 1/2 I ω² but forgot to square the angular speed of 3160 rad/s, resulting in an incorrect value. After correcting the calculation, the kinetic energy was found to be approximately 79,884,800 J. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate calculations in physics problems.
Djbari
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Problem: An experimental flywheel, used to store energy and replace an automobile engine, is a solid disk of mass 200.0 kg and radius 0.40 m. (a) What is it's rotational inertia? (my calculation says 16 kg.m) (b) When driving at 22.4 m/s (50 mph), the fully energized flywheel is rotating at an angular speed of 3160 rads/s. What is the initial rotational kinetic energy of the flywheel?

My thinking was to find the KE (rotational) = 1/2 I w^2 but the number is huge.
1/2 (16)(3160). Am I on the right track? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Djbari,

Djbari said:
Problem: An experimental flywheel, used to store energy and replace an automobile engine, is a solid disk of mass 200.0 kg and radius 0.40 m. (a) What is it's rotational inertia? (my calculation says 16 kg.m) (b) When driving at 22.4 m/s (50 mph), the fully energized flywheel is rotating at an angular speed of 3160 rads/s. What is the initial rotational kinetic energy of the flywheel?

My thinking was to find the KE (rotational) = 1/2 I w^2 but the number is huge.
1/2 (16)(3160). Am I on the right track? Thank you.

What did you get? If that's really what you multiplied together ( 1/2 (16)(3160) ) then you answer would be too small, since you did not square the angular speed.
 
I did have the 3160 squared and got 79,884,800...??
 
Djbari said:
I did have the 3160 squared and got 79,884,800...??

If they want the kinetic energy when it is spinning at 3160 rad/second, then that sounds right to me. Remember this flywheel has the mass of several people, spread out over a diameter of .8m, and is spinning at about 500 revolutions per second.
 
ok. I had no clue. Thank you for explaining. I will find out the solution tonite in class.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top