Rotational Kinetic Energy of a grinding wheel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rotational kinetic energy of a grinding wheel, which is a solid disk with a diameter of 0.240m and a mass of 2.50kg, rotating at 2050rpm. The user initially calculates the moment of inertia incorrectly using I = mr^2 instead of the correct formula I = 1/2MR^2. After realizing the mistake, they recalculate the angular velocity and kinetic energy, aiming to equate this to gravitational potential energy to determine the height from which it would need to fall. The correct approach involves using the appropriate moment of inertia formula for a solid disk to accurately compute the kinetic energy. The discussion highlights the importance of using the correct formulas in physics calculations.
Todd88
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A grinding wheel in the shape of a solid disk is 0.240m in diameter and has a mass of 2.50kg. The wheel is rotating at 2050rpm about an axis through its center.

What is its kinetic energy?

How far would it have to drop in free fall to acquire the same amount of kinetic energy?

Homework Equations


K = 1/2Iw^2
U(grav) = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution



If I can find the first answer I can equate this number to mgh to find the kinetic energy. (I think).

Now for the first question, I have no idea what I am doing wrong. First off, the radius is .12m. We can then find the moment of inertia by doing:

I = mr^2 => 2.5(.12^2) = .036kg*m^2

Then we can find angular velocity by doing:

w = 2050/60 * 2pi = 214.7rad/s

Plugging these values into the kinetic energy equation we get:

K = 1/2(.036)(214.7^2) => 830 J

This isn't right so any help is appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Double-check the formula you are using for I. You want the one for a solid disk.
 
Ah...so I = 1/2MR^2. Thanks a lot!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top