Rotational Kinetic Energy of an airplane propeller

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational kinetic energy of an airplane propeller modeled as a slender rod. The propeller has a length of 2.02 m and a mass of 127 kg, rotating at 2300 rpm, resulting in a calculated kinetic energy of approximately 3,731,117.76 J. When considering a reduction in mass to 95.25 kg while maintaining the same kinetic energy, the necessary angular speed is derived using the kinetic energy formula. The moment of inertia for the propeller is also discussed, with corrections made to the initial calculations. The final method for determining the new angular speed is confirmed as valid, ensuring accurate results.
cantgetno
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An airplane propeller is 2.02 m in length (from tip to tip) with mass 127 kg and is rotating at 2300 rpm about an axis through its center. You can model the propeller as a slender rod.
a)What is its rotational kinetic energy?
b)Suppose that, due to weight constraints, you had to reduce the propeller's mass to 75.0\% of its original mass, but you still needed to keep the same size and kinetic energy. What would its angular speed have to be, in rpm?

Homework Equations


K=0.5 (mr^2) w^2
(m***, radius, w angular speed)

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
2300 RPM = 38.33 RPS = 76.66 radians/s
2300RPM=240 rad/s

KE=0.5 (127) (1.01)^2 (240)^2 = 3731117.76 J

b)
new mass = 95.25kg

KE = 0.5(95.25)(1.01)^2 (w)^2

2 KE /(95.25)(1.01)^2) = (w)^2

[2 KE /(95.25)(1.01)^2)]^0.5 = wbut I am sure my original KE is wrong so..

thanks for the help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
2300RPM=240 rad/s

KE=0.5 (1/12)M L^2 (w)^2 ?
giving

1/24 x 127 x 2.02^2 x 240^2 = 1243705.9
?
 
I get 241 for ω.

I didn't calculate the rest out, but that looks like the right method now.
 
bingo
thanks lots and lots
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top