How Does Wheel Radius Affect Rotational Kinetic Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how wheel radius affects rotational kinetic energy in experiments involving a mass attached to a string wound around wheels of different radii. It highlights that while angular velocity (ω) is independent of radius, the moment of inertia (I) and rotational kinetic energy (Krot) are influenced by the radius. The potential energy from the falling mass (mgh) is converted into kinetic energy, leading to a comparison of Krot for both wheel sizes. The conclusion suggests that the rotational kinetic energies may differ due to the varying radii affecting the moment of inertia. Understanding the relationship between radius, angular velocity, and energy conservation is crucial in determining the outcome of the experiments.
truho
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You attach a mass M to a string and wind the string around the circumference of a wheel. The wheel has two hubs with radii R1 and R2 with R2 > R1. You perform two experiments. First you wind the string around the smaller radius wheel and allow the mass to fall a distance h. In the second experiment you wind the string around the larger radius wheel and allow the mass to fall a distance h. Rank the rotational kinetic energy Krot of the wheel for each experiment.


Homework Equations



1/2I(ω^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Basically I was thinking that ω is independent of the radius so they would be equal
but then if I=m(r^2) and ω = v/r then
I(ω^2)=1/2m(r^2)(v^2/r^2) and the r's cancel out giving us rotational kinetic energy = 1/2mv
So would the rotational kinetic energies be equal or would 1 be larger than the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about energy conservation. Where does the energy come from to turn the wheel?
 
Wouldn't it have came from the potential energy mgh?
 
truho said:
Wouldn't it have came from the potential energy mgh?

Is that a guess? :devil:
 
haha alright, I think I got it, thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top