Rotational motion - i just with net forces

AI Thread Summary
To keep mass m_2 hanging at rest while mass m_1 rotates on a frictionless table, the speed of m_1 must be determined using the relationship between radial force and tension in the string. The radial force acting on m_1 is given by F_radial = mv^2/r, while the tension T in the string must balance the gravitational force on m_2, leading to the equation T = m_2*g. When the system is at rest, the net acceleration is zero, meaning the forces must be in equilibrium. By equating the expressions for tension derived from both masses, the necessary speed for m_1 can be calculated. Understanding the connection between tension and radial force is crucial for solving the problem.
Linus Pauling
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
1. Mass m_1 on the frictionless table of the figure is connected by a string through a hole in the table to a hanging mass m_2.

With what speed must m_1 rotate in a circle of radius r if m_2 is to remain hanging at rest?


http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1073602/3/knight_Figure_08_30.jpgp

2. F_radial = mv^2/r
omega = v/r




3. I know that F_z = 0 = normal - mg
What is F_radial? I don't see how to connect the tension caused by m2 to force in the radial direction...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If T is the tension in the string, acceleration of m_2 is given by
mg - T = m_2*a.
Similarly write down the expression for m_1. When the system is at rest a = ?
 
I would have thought m_2*a = t - mg downward. This would not be motion in the radial direction. there is an inward radial force on m1 involving T. it's also obviously connected to m2, but how?

m_1*a = -m_2*T is my intuition but I think it is wrong...
 
The acceleration of both must be zero.
The centripetal force is provided by the tension in the string.
So T = ?
The system will remain at rest it T - mg = ?
Find the values of T from two equations and equate them to get the condition.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top