Rotational motion of a washing machine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two problems related to the rotational motion of a washing machine and a system of connected masses. In the first problem, the user seeks to determine the time taken for a washing machine to reach 300 RPM from rest, along with its angular acceleration and the total revolutions made. The calculations involve converting RPM to radians per second and applying angular acceleration formulas, with a consensus that it takes 5 seconds to reach the desired speed. The second problem involves calculating the time for two masses connected by a pulley to achieve a tangential speed of 40 mph, requiring conversions and the use of torque and moment of inertia formulas. The final calculations suggest it takes approximately 14 seconds to reach the target speed.
tucky
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone….well I have just started to learn about rotational motion, therefore, I am really confused so I have two different problems that I need help on.

1.) Q: A washing machine goes into the “spin cycle”. From rest the washer starts rotating, gaining 1 rev/sec of rotational velocity each second. How long before it is spinning at 300 RPM? What it its angular acceleration? How many revolutions does it go through in getting up to 300 RPM?

When the spin cycle ends the washer comes to rest from 300 RPM in 4 seconds. What it its angular acceleration? How many revolutions does it go through?

A: I think this is totally wrong but here it is:
300rev/1min * 1min/60sec = 5 rev/sec, so would that be 5 sec?
alpha = change omega/ time
omega = 5 rev/ 1sec * 2pi = 31.4rad/sec
(31.4-0)/5 = 6.26rads, which is not even in the right units, so I know it is wrong. I don’t even know how to broach this problem?

2.) Q:Two 5 kg masses are connected by an arm that measures 5 ft from end to end. In the middle of the arm is a low-friction pivot point. A lightweight pulley 2 ft in diameter is mounted at the pivot point, with a cord wrapped around the pulley. The cord is pulled with a steady 20 N tension.

How long before the masses achieve a tangential speed of 40 mph?

A: torque = m * r^2 * alpha
20kgm/s^2 = 10kg * 1.83^2 * alpha
alpha = .597m/s^2

40mph = 17.88m/s
acceleration = change speed/ time
.597m/s^2=(17.88m/s-0m/s)/t = 30.8s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For #1 you should have quit while you were ahead. I agree with 5 s.
If you want to do it in radians, well, 1 rev. = 2Π rad. so
acceleration of 1 rev./s2 = 2Π rad./s2
300 rev./min = 5 rev./s = 10Π rad./s
so we have (10Π rad./s)/(2Π rad./s2) = 5 s.

For the next one, I don't know what your 1.83 represents, but let's try it this way:

First, the moment of inertia is ∑(m*r) and in this case r=2.5 ft. =.762 m. so
I = 10*.7622 kg*m2
For the torque, the moment arm r=2 ft.=.6096m so
T=20*.6096 N*m
Next, T= Iα so
α = I/T = (20*.6096)/(10*.7622)

You want 40 mi/hr tangential but you have to convert that into a radial velocity ω to relate it to the radial acceleration α. ω=v/r so you need
40 mi/hr * 1609 m/mi / 3600 s/hr / .6096 m (the radius) = 29.33 rad./s

Now, you can relate angular acceleration to angular velocity using
ωf = ωi + α*t (Looks familiar?)
Of course, in this case, ωi=0.

You finish it. (I get 14 sec.; hopefully I didn't screw up someplace.)
 
thank you for your help gnome
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top