RThe canonical representation phi (measure theory) (Royden)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the canonical representation of a function in measure theory, specifically as described in Royden's text. The original poster seeks clarification on the definition and implications of this representation, particularly in the context of simple functions and their characteristic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the canonical representation, with one noting that it divides the function into single-step functions with distinct heights. Another participant provides an example to illustrate the concept of disjoint sets associated with different constant values of the function.

Discussion Status

Several participants have contributed insights that clarify aspects of the canonical representation, and the discussion is progressing towards a better understanding of the topic. However, the original poster has shifted focus to inquire about Borel sets, indicating an ongoing exploration of related concepts.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion regarding the definition of Borel sets, highlighting a potential gap in the provided material. This suggests a need for further exploration of foundational concepts in measure theory.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
RThe "canonical representation phi" (measure theory) (Royden)

Homework Statement



I need some help understanding the canonical representation of phi as described on p. 77 of Rodyen's 3rd edition. I've transcribed it below for those of you who don't own the book.

Homework Equations



The dunction χE defined by

χE(x) = 1 if x ε E; 0 if x [STRIKE]ε[/STRIKE] E

is called the characteristic function of E. A linear combination

ρ(x) = ƩaiχEi(x)

is called a simple function if the sets Ei are measurable. This representation for ρ is not unique. However, we note that a function ρ is simply if and only if it is measurable and assume only a finite number of values. If ρ is a simple function and {a1, ..., an} the set of nonzero values of ρ, then

ρ = ƩaiχAi(x),

where Ai = {x: ρ(x) = ai}. This representation for ρ is called the canonical representation, and it is characterized by the fact that the Ai are disjoint and the ai distinct and nonzero.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I understand the ρ(x): there are coefficients ai corresponding to each of the measurable sets Ei, and for a given x the function ρ(x) simply sums up the ai corresponding to the sets containing x. However, the definition of ρ, the "canonical representation," is eluding me.

Any help appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jamin2112! :smile:
Jamin2112 said:
… However, we note that a function ρ is simply if and only if it is measurable and assume only a finite number of values. If ρ is a simple function and {a1, ..., an} the set of nonzero values of ρ, then

ρ = ƩaiχAi(x),

where Ai = {x: ρ(x) = ai}. This representation for ρ is called the canonical representation, and it is characterized by the fact that the Ai are disjoint and the ai distinct and nonzero.

So I understand the ρ(x): there are coefficients ai corresponding to each of the measurable sets Ei, and for a given x the function ρ(x) simply sums up the ai corresponding to the sets containing x. However, the definition of ρ, the "canonical representation," is eluding me.

essentially, ρ is a step function with n steps

the canonical representation is the obvious one which divides ρ into single-step functions, each with steps of different heights :wink:
 


Take a simple example. Let ##E_1=[0,2),\ E_2=(1,3]##. Let ##\rho = 2X_{E_1} + 3X_{E_2}##. Draw a careful graph of that. You will see it takes on 3 different values, on the intervals ##[0,1],\ (1,2),\ [2,3]##. The canonical representation uses these three disjoint sets, each on which the function is a different constant.
 


Thanks, guys! That clarifies it.

Now could you explain to me what a Borel set is? My book doesn't say what a Borel set is ... it only gives a definition of the a collection of Borel sets:

"The collection β of Borel sets is the smallest σ-algebra which contains all of the open sets."

(Okay ... But what is a Borel set itself?)
 
Jamin2112 said:
... But what is a Borel set itself?)

It's any set in "the smallest σ-algebra which contains all of the open sets" :wink:

in other words, it's as defined at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borel_set
In mathematics, a Borel set is any set in a topological space that can be formed from open sets (or, equivalently, from closed sets) through the operations of countable union, countable intersection, and relative complement.​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K