Safe to remove inner wall of pond or will it burst?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peter2108
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pond Wall
AI Thread Summary
Removing the inner wall of the fishpond raises concerns about the structural integrity of the outer wall, particularly under the pressure exerted by the water. The total force calculations suggest significant pressure, but the balance of forces on opposing sides complicates the assessment of risk. The outer wall's failure depends on its weakest link, which is influenced by the uniformity and condition of the interlocking wooden blocks. There is uncertainty regarding how close the structure is to failure and the longevity of pressure-treated wood. Caution is advised before making any modifications to the pond's structure.
peter2108
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Safe to remove inner wall of pond or will it burst??

1.Problem
I have a fishpond. It is raised 0.4m above the ground, the wall being interlocking wooden blocks. The blocks are all locked together all the way round so they could be picked up and put down somewhere else. The pond is 2.4m long by 1.6m. In fact the bounding wall is double skinned, the inner wall is connected to outer by a buttreses.I don't think the inner wall is needed. I would like to remove it. But is the force on the walls enough to make this imprudent.The guy selling the blocks originally said you needed a double skin. ... but he would wouldn't he?

Can I remove the inner wall safely? Might the wall burst?

Homework Equations


After removing inner wall total force on long side is
\int ^{h}_{0} \rho \; g \; w \; y \; dy
where \rho is density of water, g is acceleration due to gravity, h is height and w is length of wall.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well the total force on the long side is 1/2 \times 1000 \times 9.81 \times 2.4 \times 0.4^{2} \ = \ 1883. Sounds quite a lot. But the force on the North side of the wall is exactly balanced by the force in the opposite direction on the South side. So it can be ignored? Surely not. Again the length of the wall affects the total force so that a side of 24m instead of 2.4m would be under 10 times the force. But my intuition is that the length of the sides does not matter. It's all about the dam bursting and that seems to depend only the pressure which is 1883/2.4 \ = \ 784. But how to interpret this? I think if I divide by g I get the "weight" of the water pressing on the wall which would be 784/9.81 \ = \ 79. I think that is far too high. So now I am puzzled.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Without diving into your analysis, you need to know the conditions that would make the outer wall fail if the inner wall was removed. How close would you be to the failure condition? How comfortable are you with being that close? Be advised that the outer wall will fail at its weakest link--how uniformly constructed are these interlocking wooden blocks? How long do you expect this structure to last? Even pressure-treated wood is a semi-permanent solution.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top