Satelites & Orbits: Find the Orbital Speed

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex7298
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the orbital speed of a satellite above Jupiter, using the formula V=sqrt(GM/r). The user initially miscalculated the orbital radius by not properly accounting for the altitude of the satellite, leading to an incorrect speed. After correcting the calculation, they found the correct orbital speed to be approximately 4.2x10^4 m/s. Additionally, the user inquired about determining the radius for a rotating space station where astronauts weigh half their weight on Earth, initially struggling with the equation setup. After some back-and-forth, they realized a mistake in their calculations and arrived at the correct answer.
alex7298
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A satelite is placed in orbit 6.00x10^5 meters above the surface of Jupiter which has a mass of 1.90x10^27kg and has a radius of 7.14x10^7m. Find the orbital speed of the satelite

Homework Equations



V=sqroot(GM/r)


The Attempt at a Solution



First i added the altitude of the satelite to the radius of Jupiter to find the total orbital radius, then just plugged in numbers to get:

V=sqroot((6.67x10^-11)(1.90x10^27kg)/7.2x10^7m)

That seems like it would be right but my answer is way too big

Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A common mistake in these problems is to forget the square root.

Is that what you did?

The answer I got was reasonable using your method.
 
lol this time i got 4.2x10^4m/s which is the right answer. Maybe i did forget the squre root.
Thanks

I had one more question and it is:
Suppose the surface of a space station is rotating and 35.8m/s. What must be the value of r (radius) for the astronauts to weigh one-half their weight on earth.

I was able to get two equations equal to each other and they are M(V^2/r)=M(g)
Then i rearranged to get V^2/r=1/2g-----> i divided "g" by two because of the half weight thing
but when i solve for r its a super small number
where am i going wrong?
 
It seems right to me... re-check your solving for r.

Did you remember to square the velocity? :)

What do you mean by "super small number"?
 
gah i made another stupid mistake
i did (1/2g)/V^2 for some reason
i have the right answer now though
lol I am having an off night
thansk tough
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top