Scalar product used for length?

phospho
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
I got asked how the scalar product can be used to find the length of a vector? Could someone please explain
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean vector product, also called the dot product?

V°V = |V|^2.

Or do you mean the triple scalar product:

|A°BxC|= volume of the parallelepiped with three sides defined by A,B,C.


If it is the triple scalar product you will need more information to obtain a vectors length - but the dot product provides it immediately.
 
UltrafastPED said:
Do you mean vector product, also called the dot product?

V°V = |V|^2.

Or do you mean the triple scalar product:

|A°BxC|= volume of the parallelepiped with three sides defined by A,B,C.If it is the triple scalar product you will need more information to obtain a vectors length - but the dot product provides it immediately.

To my knowledge, the vector product and the dot product are never given the same meaning. The vector product yields a vector quantity; the dot product yields a scalar quantity.

I'm not sure how one could use the scalar product to find the length of an arbitrary vector -- it seems like a redundant question to me. Do you know how to find the magnitude of a vector?
 
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
To my knowledge, the vector product and the dot product are never given the same meaning. The vector product yields a vector quantity; the dot product yields a scalar quantity.

There are many vector products: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorMultiplication.html

Two of those listed above result in a scalar. I was trying to determine which one he was referring to; the OPs language was ambiguous.

The vector inner product (dot product) is the obvious method.

But the original requestor has disappeared ... so the problem is dead.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top