I Scatter radiation and film fogging

Asmaa Mohammad
Messages
182
Reaction score
7
Hello,

During the procedure of radiography using x-rays, scatter radiation occurs, due to the difference in densities of the object being radiographed.

That scatter radiation causes fogging (noise) of the film, i.e. the contrast of the film is reduced due to extra darkening of some areas of the film (increase in the overall density of the image).

What I have difficulty to imagine is how could these scattered photons increase the density of the radiographic image. Do they hit the object again or do they hit the film in a way that causes fogging (so what is that way?).

All in all, hope someone will clarify it for me!

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Asmaa Mohammad said:
What I have difficulty to imagine is how could these scattered photons increase the density of the radiographic image.

The same way as any x-ray. The problem with scatter is that the source of scatter is extended resulting in the more or less uniform additional exposure across the whole film. The contrast you observe on the film is due both to the characteristics of the film and the variation of the exposure of the film due to the variation of the transmitted radiation through the object. The film produces an optical density depending on the exposure; the larger the ranging of exposures the more optical densities that will be registered. With no scatter you may have a large range variation of exposure from the object. This may result in the visualization of the who range of optical densities that can be appreciated by the eye. As the scatter is increase the range of exposures across the whole film decreases. This leaves a smaller range in optical densities to be registered on the film. Thus the contrast is reduced.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top